Comparison of Healing Measures Tibial Fractures Following Standard Intramedullary Nailing or Micromotion Tibial Intramedullary Nailing

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18-85
SponsorUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham

About this trial

The primary purpose of this study is to perform a high-quality randomized control trial comparing intramedullary tibial nail fixation with standard design nails to a micromotion tibial nail device, to evaluate the rates of union and post-operative outcomes.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Age 18 - 85 years

Stable Tibial fracture recommended for surgical intervention

Disqualifiers

Patients not meeting inclusion criteria

Unstable fracture patterns e.g. those needing a secondary intervention - masquelet/cement spacer)

Previously non-ambulatory patients

Delayed presentation of fracture (>4 weeks)

Trial design

Design model

Single group

Treatments tested in this trial

  • micromotion intramedullary nail cohort

    Procedure/Surgery

    use of at least 2 distal interlocking screws and the use of a minimum of 1 proximal tibial interlocking screw

  • standard intramedullary nail cohort

    Procedure/Surgery

    use of at least 2 distal interlocking screws and the use of a minimum of 1 proximal interlocking screw

Treatment groups

100 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Micromotion CohortExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Standard CohortExperimental treatment 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

The difference in radiographic union

bridging callus, minimum three cortices bridged

Time frame
12,18 and 24 weeks between micromotion intramedullary fixation and standard IMN post operatively

Secondary outcomes

1

difference in complication rates

Patient reported outcomes scores

Time frame
1 year post-operatively

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.