Health TrialsbyHealthPanel

Comparison of Immediate Implant Placement With Titanium Mesh Versus Collagen Membrane in Type II Socket:

ConditionsBone AugmentationBadly Broken Maxillary Premolars Indicated for Extraction
Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age21-50
SponsorMisr International University

About this trial

Statement of the problem: Immediate implant placement is faced with several problems. One of the most important issues is dealing with defects in the buccal plate of bone in the esthetic zone.

Aim: The aim of this study is to assess the buccal bone thickness after augmentation with titanium mesh and xenograft upon flapless immediate implant placement.

Eligibility criteria

This trial accepts healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Patients who have at least one remaining root or badly decayed tooth in anterior maxilla.

Systemically free patients (American Society of Anesthesiologists I; ASA I)

Patients aged from 21 to 50 years old

Buccal bone partial deficiency (extraction socket type II)

Disqualifiers

Patients with habits that may jeopardize the implant longevity and affect the results of the study such as parafunctional habits such as bruxism

Smokers

Pregnant and lactating females

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • collagen membrane

    Procedure/Surgery

    augmentation of the buccal plate of bone with xenograft and collagen membrane

  • titanium mesh

    Procedure/Surgery

    augmentation of the buccal plate of bone with xenograft and titanium mesh

Treatment groups

20 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: immediate implant with collagen membraneActive comparator 1 intervention
Group B: immediate implant with titanium meshActive comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Buccal bone thickness

assessment of the Buccal bone thickness in mm using CBCT

Time frame
at baseline, 6 and 12 months

Secondary outcomes

1

Soft tissue thickness

Soft tissue thickness will be assessed in mm using volumetric analysis method

Time frame
at baseline 6 and 12 months
2

Keratinized tissue width

measurement of the keratinized tissue width in mm using periodontal probe

Time frame
at baseline, 6 and 12 months

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Misr International University

Lead sponsor

Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Apply now