About this trial
This study will compare orthodontic molar protraction with and without adjunctive periodontally accelerated osteogenic orthodontic (PAOO) surgery prior to orthodontic tooth movement.
To the investigators' knowledge, this type of molar retraction in adult patients has not been compared with and without the adjunctive use of PAOO for differences in clinical linear tooth movement and patient centered outcomes (discomfort, change in daily activities, satisfaction with esthetic outcomes) in a controlled study.
Eligibility criteria
This trial accepts healthy volunteersQualifiers
English speaking
At least 18 years old
Must be a patient of the University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB) Dental School
Able to read and understand informed consent document
Disqualifiers
Non-English speaking
Less than 18 years old
Smokers/tobacco users (>10 cigarettes/day)
Patients with systemic pathologies or conditions contraindicating oral surgical procedures or adversely affecting wound healing
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
Orthodontic Molar Protraction and PAOO
Procedure/SurgeryMolar Protraction with Orthodontic Tooth Movement and Adjunctive Periodontally Accelerated Osteogenic Orthodontics (PAOO) Surgery was performed on all study sites in this arm in coordination with standard orthodontic molar protraction using traditional bands/brackets and orthodontic wires.
Orthodontic Molar Protraction
Procedure/SurgeryStandard orthodontic molar protraction using traditional bands/brackets and orthodontic wires.
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Linear millimeters of molar tooth movement
Compare the clinical linear molar tooth movement over a 3 month time frame (Baseline to 3 months) between two groups receiving orthodontic therapy alone or in combination with periodontally accelerated osteogenic orthodontics (PAOO).
Tooth angulation as measured radiographically
Compare the radiographic mesial inclination of the molar to be protracted over a 3-month time frame (Baseline to 3 months) between two groups receiving orthodontics therapy alone or in combination with periodontally accelerated osteogenic orthodontics (PAOO).
Secondary outcomes
Periodontal probing depth
Compare the periodontal probing depth (PD) at six sites per tooth at treated teeth over a 3-month time frame (Baseline to 3 months) between two groups receiving orthodontics therapy alone or in combination with periodontally accelerated osteogenic orthodontics (PAOO).
Periodontal clinical attachment level
Compare the clinical attachment level (CAL) at six sites per tooth at treated teeth over a 3-month time frame (Baseline to 3 months) between two groups receiving orthodontics therapy alone or in combination with periodontally accelerated osteogenic orthodontics (PAOO).
Periodontal width of keratinized tissue
Compare the width of keratinized tissue (KT) at up to two sites per tooth at treated teeth over a 3-month time frame (Baseline to 3 months) between two groups receiving orthodontics therapy alone or in combination with periodontally accelerated osteogenic orthodontics (PAOO).
Periodontal width of attached tissue
Compare the width of attached tissue at up to two sites per tooth at treated teeth over a 3-month time frame (Baseline to 3 months) between two groups receiving orthodontics therapy alone or in combination with periodontally accelerated osteogenic orthodontics (PAOO).
Locations
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: