Health TrialsbyHealthPanel

Comparison of Pain Relief and Peripheral Perfusion Index

ConditionErector Spinea Plane Block
Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age20-80
SponsorKeimyung University Dongsan Medical Center

About this trial

The primary endpoint of this study is to compare the pain relief and peripheral perfusion index using different volume of local anesthetics in erector spinae plane block.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

lumbar disc herniation

lumbar foraminal stenosis

lumbar central stenosis

lumbar spondylolisthesis

Disqualifiers

Allergy to local anesthetics or contrast medium

Pregnancy

Spine deformity

Prior history of lumbar spine surgery

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • erector spinae plane block

    Procedure/Surgery

    fascial plane injection using ultrasound

Treatment groups

64 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: 10 ml lumbar ESPB groupPlacebo comparator 1 intervention
Group B: 20 ml lumbar ESPB groupExperimental treatment 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Numerical rating scale changes among 5 times period

minimum (1) and maximum value (10), lower score means better outcome

Time frame
Baseline, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 8 weeks after the completion of erector spine plane block

Secondary outcomes

1

back pain functional scale among 3 times period

minimum (0) and maximum value (60), higher score means better outcome

Time frame
Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks after the completion of erector spine plane block
2

Perfusion index changes among 4 times period

erfusion index changes after lumbar ESPB among 4 times period

Time frame
baseline, 10minutes after ESPB, 20 minutes after ESPB, 30 minutes after ESPB

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center

Lead sponsor

Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Apply now