COmparison of PENG Block and SIFICB in Hip Fracture Surgeries
Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age40-80
SponsorAdiyaman University Research Hospital
About this trial
The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of the PENG block and SIFIB in facilitating the positioning for neuroaxial anesthesia and their impact on the quality of postoperative analgesia.
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
Hip fractures
40-80 years
Disqualifiers
Contraindicated to spinal anesthesia
allergy to local anesthetics
severe peripheral neuropathy
mental disorders
Trial design
Design model
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
PENG Block
Procedure/SurgeryThe PENG block will be performed on the patient with the injection of local anesthesia under ultrasound guidance in the femoral region, beneath the biceps tendon.
SIFICB Block
Procedure/SurgeryThe SIFIB block will be performed on the patient with the injection of local anesthetic between the iliac fascia and iliac muscle in the femoral region, under ultrasound guidance.
Treatment groups
150 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groupsGroup A: Group PExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Group SExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
1
Patient positioning
In patients with hip fractures, during spinal anesthesia, the angle between the patient's back and the operating table will be recorded while positioning the patient.
Time frame
During neuroaxial block procedureSecondary outcomes
1
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score
VAS score is a measurement instrument for subjective characteristics of pain. VAS score range from 0 to 10. 0 refers to no pain and 10 refers to the worst pain ever had
Time frame
During neuroaxial block procedureLocations
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: