Comparison of Performing V-Notes Hysterectomy Under Spinal Anesthesia and General Anesthesia
Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexFemale
AgeNot listed
SponsorCukurova University
About this trial
Vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery is recognized as a significant advancement in women's health, representing an extension of minimally invasive surgery. Research and clinical experience with this technique are ongoing, contributing to its increasing adoption as a suitable option for a broader patient population.
The aim of this study is to evaluate vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery hysterectomy performed under general anesthesia versus regional anesthesia in terms of surgical comfort, length of hospital stay, postoperative pain, and other relevant clinical outcomes, as well as to compare patients' recovery times.
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
None
Disqualifiers
None
Trial design
Design model
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
Vnotes hysterectomy under spinal anesthesia
Procedure/SurgeryV-notes hysterectomy performed under spinal anesthesia according to the study protocol
Vnotes hysterectomy under general anesthesia
Procedure/SurgeryV-notes hysterectomy performed under general anesthesia according to the study protocol
Treatment groups
28 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groupsGroup A: Spinal Anesthesia GroupExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: General Anesthesia GroupActive comparator 1 intervention
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
1
Pain score
Pain intensity will be assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), ranging from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating worse pain.
Time frame
Postoperative Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain score at 24 hourLocations
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: