Comparison of Postoperative Outcomes of Laparoscopic Lateral Suspension and V-NOTES Lateral Suspension With the Salman Ketenci Gencer Technique

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot listed
Trial typeObservational
Biological sexFemale
Age18-75
SponsorGaziosmanpasa Research and Education Hospital

About this trial

Comparison of Early Postoperative Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Lateral Suspension and V-NOTES Lateral Suspension with the Salman Ketenci Gencer Technique

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Patients with stage 3 or 4 pelvic organ prolapse Sexually active patients

Disqualifiers

Cervical pathology History of loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) or conization Presence of vaginal, pelvic, or adnexal mass Suspicious abdominal malignancy Morbid obesity Any pelvic infection Signs of pregnancy

Trial population

The study planned to include 84 patients with pelvic organ prolapse.

Trial design

Design model

Cohort

Time perspective

Retrospective

Treatments tested in this trial

Not listed

Trial groups

84 Participants
are grouped into 2 trial groups
Group A: patients underwent laparoscopic lateral suspension
Group B: patients underwent V-NOTES lateral suspension with SalmanKetenciGencer technique

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Postoperative Improvement in Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP) Severity by POP-Q Score

POP-Q measurements assess the degree of pelvic organ prolapse in patients, using a combined system that includes multiple parameters to evaluate the anterior and posterior vaginal walls, cervix, and vaginal vault. This study will compare the POP-Q values of patients following laparoscopic lateral suspension and V-Notes lateral suspension with the Salmanketencigencer technique to assess improvements in prolapse severity.

Time frame
6 months

Secondary outcomes

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.