Comparison of Talc Slurry Versus Talc Insufflation: A Study on Effectiveness, Safety, and Hospital Outcomes in Pleurodesis

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age12+
SponsorUniversity of Health Sciences Lahore

About this trial

Pleural effusion is characterized by the accumulation of fluid in the pleural space, which typically contains about 10-20 mL of pleural fluid that is crucial for the movement of the lungs against the chest wall. This fluid closely resembles plasma but has a lower protein concentration, usually less than 1.5 gm/dL. It primarily originates from pleural capillaries and the interstitial spaces of the lung, and is reabsorbed through the lymphatic vessels in the parietal pleura, either via small openings known as stomas or through a process called transcytosis (1, 2). When the balance between fluid production and reabsorption is disrupted-often due to various pathogenic mechanisms-it can lead to pleural effusion. In such cases, effective management is essential. This study aims to conduct a thorough comparison of the two talc administration methods-TS and TI-using sterilized, large-particle, asbestos-free talc powder. By examining key outcome measures such as pleurodesis success rates, procedural morbidity, and length of hospital stay, the goal is to provide clinicians with evidence-based guidance to facilitate informed decision-making in the management of pleural effusions.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

patients aged 12 years and older.

Diagnosed with malignant pleural effusions or pneumothoraces.

ECOG performance status of 0-2.

Life expectancy of at least 3 months.

Disqualifiers

Patients younger than 12 years old

Female patients who are pregnant or lactating

Patients with encysted or septated pleural effusions and pneumothoraces

Patients presenting with respiratory failure

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Pleurodesis

    Procedure/Surgery

    Talc slurry pleurodesis is a chemical technique for managing recurrent pleural effusions and pneumothoraces. The procedure involves instilling a suspension of talc (4-5 grams) in sterile saline (50-100 mL) into the pleural space via a chest tube. This induces an inflammatory reaction, leading to fibrosis and fusion of pleural surfaces. The technique demonstrates 70-90% success rates in malignant pleural effusions and pneumothoraces, with efficacy comparable to talc poudrage. While generally safe, potential complications include pain, fever, and rarely, pneumonitis or empyema. Use of large-particle, asbestos-free talc and standardized protocols has improved its safety profile.

  • pleurodesis

    Procedure/Surgery

    Talc insufflation, is a pleurodesis technique involving direct insufflation of dry talc powder into the pleural cavity during thoracoscopy. It allows visual inspection of the pleural space and concurrent diagnostic procedures. Success rates range from 85% to 93% for malignant pleural effusions and pneumothoraces, with efficacy comparable or potentially superior to talc slurry in some studies. The procedure typically requires general anesthesia and is more invasive than talc slurry. Common side effects include chest pain, fever, and dyspnea. The risk of severe respiratory complications has decreased with large-particle, asbestos-free talc. While effective, the choice between insufflation and slurry depends on patient factors, institutional expertise, and resource availability.

Treatment groups

160 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Talc Slurry GroupExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Talc Insufflation GroupExperimental treatment 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Success of Pleurodesis

The success rate of pleurodesis is defined as the percentage of patients who achieve complete resolution of pleural effusion or pneumothorax within a specified time frame of 01 months post-procedure. Success is assessed through follow-up chest radiographs, with criteria for success including the absence of fluid reaccumulation or lung collapse during this period. Clinical improvement in symptoms such as dyspnea may also be considered as supplementary evidence of a successful outcome.

Time frame
01 months post-procedure

Secondary outcomes

1

Procedural Morbidity of pleurodesis

Procedural morbidity refers to the incidence and severity of complications directly attributable to the pleurodesis procedure, occurring within 30 days post-procedure.

Time frame
30 days

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: