Stainless steel crowns have shown high success in restoring carious primary molars over a longer period of time than conventional restorations. This study aims to evaluate the treatment effectiveness of conventional SSCs restoration and Hall technique in treating carious primary molars
Agree and voluntarily participate in the research (with the patient's parent/guardian consent for participation)
Children have a primary molar with at least 2 carious lesions corresponding to International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS) scores 4 or at least 1 carious lesion corresponding to ICDAS scores 5 and 6.
Children with systemic diseases such as immunodeficiency, cardiovascular disease, or bleeding disorders.
Children are allergic to nickel and resin.
Children unable to return for recall visits.
Primary molar has signs of pulpal/periapical diseases (irreversible pulpitis, pulp necrosis, loosening, fistula, or abscess).
Parallel
Placement of stainless steel crowns on primary molars
Procedure/SurgeryPreformed metal crowns have been placed to treat caries in primary molars
Failure of stainless steel crowns
Level 1 failures was considered when there were any signs of failure related to SSCs. Level 2 failures was considered when there were any signs of related pulpal and periapical pathology. Success was considered when Level 1 and 2 failures were absent.
Failure of stainless steel crowns
Level 1 failures was considered when there were any signs of failure related to SSCs. Level 2 failures was considered when there were any signs of related pulpal and periapical pathology. Success was considered when Level 1 and 2 failures were absent.
Failure of stainless steel crowns
Level 1 failures was considered when there were any signs of failure related to SSCs. Level 2 failures was considered when there were any signs of related pulpal and periapical pathology. Success was considered when Level 1 and 2 failures were absent.
Failure of stainless steel crowns
Level 1 failures was considered when there were any signs of failure related to SSCs. Level 2 failures was considered when there were any signs of related pulpal and periapical pathology. Success was considered when Level 1 and 2 failures were absent.
Occlusal contact
Occlusal contact was assessed as follows: normal occlusion or rised occlusion.
Occlusal contact
Occlusal contact was assessed as follows: normal occlusion or rised occlusion.
Occlusal contact
Occlusal contact was assessed as follows: normal occlusion or rised occlusion.
Occlusal contact
Occlusal contact was assessed as follows: normal occlusion or rised occlusion.
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
