Comparison of Transcatheter Edge-to-edge Repair Using Echo Only with Echo Combined with X Ray for Mitral Regurgitation (ECHO-CLIP)

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
AgeNot listed
SponsorPan Xiangbin

About this trial

Mitral regurgitation (MR) is a common valvular heart disease in the elderly population, frequently associated with poor prognosis if not treated. Transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) has recently emerged as a popular strategy due to minimal invasiveness. What's more, previous studies, such as EVEREST II and COAPT study, have demonstrated its efficacy in high-risk patients with primary or secondary MR. Conventional TEER procedure, however, is performed under combined guidance of both echocardiography and fluoroscopy, which potentially results in high radiation exposure and limits its application. Since 2021 2021, the investigators have changed the procedural methodology by performing TEER under full echocardiographic guidance on accumulated dozens of MR patients successfully. To confirm the efficacy of a fully echo-guided TEER procedure, the investigators conduct the ECHO-CLIP study to compare its outcomes with the conventional TEER procedure, as well as evaluate the outcomes of this novel methodology in special populations with radiation contraindications. ECHO-CLIP study is a prospective, multicenter, open-label, noninferior, randomized controlled trial of TEER by two different methodological strategies in treating severe primary or secondary MR. It is anticipated to enroll a total of 200 patients as well to complete the enrollment before Dec 31, 2025 and the follow-up before Dec 31, 2026. This work will potentially demonstrate the feasibility and efficacy of the fully echo-guided TEER procedure, thereby revolutionizing the TEER methodology and benefiting more patients.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Symptomatic DMR subjects with MR ≥ 3+ at high surgical risk in terms of STS Predicted Risk of Mortality replacement score ≥ 8 or STS Predicted Risk of Mortality repair score ≥ 6.*

FMR subjects with LVESD ≤ 70 mm and MR ≥ 3+, despite administration of GDMT for 30 days.*

MV anatomy appropriate for TEER procedure.

Subjects willing to participate in this study and complete the follow-up on schedule after obtaining informed consent.

Disqualifiers

Myocardial infarction within 12 weeks prior to randomization.

Need for concurrent other cardiac procedures.

Any endovascular intervention or surgery within 30 days prior to randomization.

LVEF < 20%.

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Echocardiographic guidance

    Procedure/Surgery

    After detailed evaluation, patients randomized in this group will undergo TEER procedure under guidance of fully echocardiography but any fluoroscopy in the entire process.

  • Fluoroscopic guidance

    Procedure/Surgery

    After detailed evaluation, patients randomized in this group will undergo TEER procedure under combined guidance of echocardiography and fluoroscopy in the entire process.

Treatment groups

200 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Echocardiography-guided groupExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Fluoroscopy-guided groupActive comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

30-day successful rate after device implantation (residual MR ≤2+)

The primary outcome is the success rate of device implantation at 30 days ( residual MR≤moderate). Evaluation of the primary endpoints was done by specialized sonographers blinded to the intervention.

Time frame
At 30 days after device implantation

Secondary outcomes

1

1-year all-cause mortality

All-cause mortality at 1 year after implantation.

Time frame
At 1 year after implantation
2

1-year composite of death, reintervention, and recurrent MR ≥ 3+

Composite of death, reintervention, and recurrent MR ≥ 3+ at 1 year

Time frame
At 1 year after implantation
3

Change in SF-36 score from baseline to 30 days and 1 year.

Change in 36-Item Short Form Survey score from baseline to 30 days and 1 year will be assessed. An increased score after implantation indicates an improvement in quality of life, while a decreased score after implantation indicates an impairment in quality of life.

Time frame
At 30 days and 1 year after implantation
4

Change in KCCQ score from baseline to 30 days and 1 year.

Change in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire score from baseline to 30 days and 1 year wiil be assessed. An increased score after implantation indicates an improvement in quality of life, while a decreased score after implantation indicates an impairment in quality of life.

Time frame
At 30 days and 1 year after implantation

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Pan Xiangbin

Lead sponsor

Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Fuwai Hospital

Sponsor institution