Comparison of Two Needle Agitation Strategies in Endobronchial Ultrasound-guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) for Diagnostic Yield

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorPhan Quang Hieu

About this trial

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether the number of needle agitations during endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) affects diagnostic yield in patients with enlarged mediastinal lymph nodes. The study will also evaluate tissue sample quality and the safety of different needle agitation strategies.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

Does the number of needle agitations improve diagnostic yield? Does a higher number of needle agitations increase tissue core length and specimen adequacy? Are there differences in procedure-related complications between the two needle agitation strategies? Researchers will compare two needle agitation strategies during EBUS-TBNA to see if one approach provides better diagnostic performance, improved sample quality, and similar procedural safety.

Participants will:

* Undergo EBUS-TBNA as part of their clinical evaluation * Be randomly assigned to one of two needle agitation strategies * Have tissue samples measured for core length and assessed for diagnostic adequacy * Be monitored for procedure-related complications

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Age ≥ 18 years

Presence of enlarged mediastinal or hilar lymph nodes requiring diagnostic evaluation on chest computed tomography (CT), defined as short-axis diameter ≥ 10 mm measured on axial images

Clinical indication for EBUS-TBNA

Ability to provide written informed consent

Disqualifiers

Uncorrected coagulation disorders (platelet count < 100,000/mm³; International normalized ratio (INR) > 1.5; or prothrombin time < 50% of control)

Acute myocardial infarction within the preceding 4 weeks or ongoing unstable angina

Significant upper airway obstruction (benign or malignant) with ≥ 50% reduction in tracheal lumen diameter

Hemodynamic instability (e.g., persistent hypotension, significant arrhythmia, or need for vasopressors)

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Needle Agitation Strategy During EBUS-TBNA

    Procedure/Surgery

    The intervention consists of modifying the number of needle agitations performed during each needle pass in endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA). Participants are randomized to one of two predefined agitation strategies: a low-range strategy (10 to fewer than 30 agitations per pass, target approximately 20) or a high-range strategy (30 to 60 agitations per pass, target approximately 45 to 50). All other procedural variables, including needle type, number of passes, suction technique, and specimen handling, are standardized.

Treatment groups

180 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: 10 to <30 Agitations (Target 20)Experimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: 30 to 60 Agitations (Target 45-50)Experimental treatment 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Diagnostic Yield of EBUS-TBNA

Proportion of cases in which EBUS-TBNA provides a definitive histopathological diagnosis based on tissue specimens obtained during the procedure.

Time frame
Within 7-14 days after the procedure

Secondary outcomes

1

Tissue Core Length

Measured length of the tissue core specimen obtained during EBUS-TBNA, recorded in centimeters immediately after specimen collection.

Time frame
Immediately after the procedure

Other outcomes

1

Procedure-Related Complication Rate

Incidence of procedure-related complications, including bleeding, infection, pneumothorax, or other adverse events associated with EBUS-TBNA.

Time frame
Within 30 days after the procedure

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Phan Quang Hieu

Lead sponsor

University Medical Center Ho Chi Minh City (UMC)

Sponsor institution

University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City

Collaborator