Comparison of Uncomplicated Candidemia Therapy Duration in Children

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age120+
SponsorArkansas Children's Hospital Research Institute

About this trial

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare antifungal therapy duration in pediatric uncomplicated candidemia. The specific aims are:

* Compare the desirability of outcome ranking in children with uncomplicated candidemia randomized to 7 additional days of antifungal therapy (standard-course) versus no additional antifungal therapy (short-course) after already receiving 7 days of echinocandin therapy. * Compare the 14-day desirability of outcome measure for subjects with a negative and those with a positive T2Candida® biomarker at day 7 of therapy within randomized groups.

Participants meeting eligibility criteria will be approached and consented between day 5 and 7 of primary systemic antifungal therapy. On day 7 of primary systemic antifungal therapy, inclusion and exclusion criteria will again be reviewed for consented patients and those still eligible will be randomized 1:1 to the two study arms. Researchers will compare no additional antifungal therapy (short-course) versus 7 additional days of systemic antifungal therapy (standard-course) in pediatric patients with uncomplicated candidemia who have already received 7 days of primary systemic antifungal therapy to see if shorter durations are as effective as longer durations in treating uncomplicated candidemia.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Age > 120 days at the time of the first negative blood culture at any participating site;

Candidemia with at least one positive blood culture for any Candida spp;

Receiving/received an echinocandin (caspofungin, micafungin, anidulafungin, or rezafungin) as primary antifungal therapy for candidemia for at least 2 days from day of first negative culture with continuation of uninterrupted systemic antifungal therapy at the time of enrollment);

Sustained clearance of Candida spp. defined as negative blood culture(s) obtained after onset of candidemia and before day of randomization;

Disqualifiers

Already receiving antifungal therapy for a previously diagnosed systemic invasive fungal disease;

Neutropenic (absolute neutrophil count < 500 cells/µl) at the time of enrollment or anticipated to be neutropenic in the week following randomization;

Have an underlying condition that requires them to be on antifungal prophylaxis when not receiving directed therapy for an invasive fungal disease;

Previous enrollment in this trial;

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • therapy duration

    Other intervention

    the standard-course arm will receive 14 days total of antifungal therapy and the short-course arm will only receive 7 days of therapy

Treatment groups

420 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Short-course therapyExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Standard-course therapyNo intervention 0 interventions

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Compare the desirability of outcome ranking (DOOR) in short-course vs standard-course arm

The primary analysis for the primary objective will compare the DOOR distributions at 7 days from randomization (i.e., outcome assessment on Day 14 from first negative blood culture) between subjects from the two study groups, based on randomized treatment assignments, in accordance with the intention-to-treat principle. The primary analysis will use the DOORs assigned on this day to assess which therapy course is better, short-course or standard-course.

Time frame
The measures assigned on Day 14 will inform the primary analysis for the primary objective

Secondary outcomes

1

Compare the DOOR for subjects with a negative vs positive T2 Candida® biomarker at day 7

The results of the Day 7 T2Candida® biomarker (i.e. detected versus not detected) and the randomization group (i.e. short-course versus standard-course) will allow for the following four subsets of patients: 1. Patient is randomized to short-course group and has a not-detected result for the T2Candida® biomarker at time of randomization; 2. patient is randomized to short-course group and has a detected T2Candida® biomarker at time of randomization; 3. patient is randomized to standard-course group and has a not-detected result for the T2Candida® biomarker at time of randomization; 4. patient is randomized to standard-course group and has a detected T2Candida® biomarker at time of randomization. This analysis will compare the DOOR categories between the first two groups (i.e. short-course and not-detected versus short-course and detected) and then be repeated for the second two groups (i.e. standard-course and not detected versus standard-course and detected).

Time frame
The DOOR measure on Day 14 will be used for the primary analysis for the secondary objective.

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Arkansas Children's Hospital Research Institute

Lead sponsor

Westat

Collaborator

St. Jude Children's Research Hospital

Collaborator

George Washington University

Collaborator

Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

Collaborator

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)

Collaborator