About this trial
This study compares vNOTES salpingectomy and laparoscopic salpingectomy in the treatment of ectopic pregnancy, focusing on outcomes such as operative time, postoperative pain, and recovery.
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
None
Disqualifiers
None
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
vNOTES Salpingectomy Group.
Procedure/SurgeryParticipants will undergo salpingectomy using the vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) technique. This minimally invasive procedure is performed transvaginally without abdominal incisions, offering potential benefits such as less postoperative pain, faster recovery, and better cosmetic outcomes.
Laparoscopic Salpingectomy
Procedure/SurgeryParticipants will undergo conventional laparoscopic salpingectomy, a minimally invasive surgical technique performed through small abdominal incisions using a laparoscope. This method is the current standard approach for managing ectopic pregnancies.
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Change in Sexual Function Measured by PISQ-12 at 6 Months
Sexual function will be evaluated using the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-12), a validated instrument for assessing sexual function in women with pelvic floor disorders. Scores range from 0 to 48, with higher scores indicating better sexual function. The change in PISQ-12 scores from baseline to 6 months postoperatively will be compared between the vNOTES and laparoscopic groups.
Postoperative Pain Score (VAS) at 6 Hours After Surgery
Postoperative pain will be assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates the worst imaginable pain. The pain score at the 6th postoperative hour will be compared between the vNOTES and laparoscopic groups.
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.