Conditioning Regimen in Elderly AML Patients Receiving Haplo-HSCT.

ConditionsAMLElderly
Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age55+
SponsorPeking University People's Hospital

About this trial

Elderly AML patients receiving conventional chemotherapy have poor prognosis. Allo-HSCT offers better long-term survival than chemotherapy, while high TRM limits its use. Current research focuses more on improving conditioning regimens to reduce TRM. Studies suggest Bu/Flu/Cy/ATG are safer and more effective for elderly AML haplo-HSCT, lowering TRM. However, prospective randomized trials are lacking. This study aims to compare Bu/Flu/Cy/ATG vs. Bu/Cy/ATG to determine if TRM can be reduced in elderly AML undergoing haplo-HSCT.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

None

Disqualifiers

(a) Uncontrolled active infection. (b) Secondary AML. (c)Refusal to provide informed consent.

Trial design

Design model

Single group

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Bu/Flu/Cy/ATG

    Procedure/Surgery

    The Bu/Flu/Cy/ATG conditioning regimen consists of the following components: Ara-C (2 g/m²/day, injected i.v.) on days-10 and-9; Bu (0.8 mg/kg, q6h, injected i.v.) on days -8 to -6; Flu (30 mg/m²/day, injected i.v.) from day-6 to day-2; Cy (1.0 g/m²/day, injected i.v.) on days-5 and-4; and ATG (2.5 mg/kg/day) on days-5 to -2.

  • Bu/Cy/ATG

    Procedure/Surgery

    The Bu/Cy/ATG conditioning regimen consists of the following components: Ara-C (4 g/m²/day, injected i.v.) on day-9; Bu (0.8 mg/kg, q6h, injected i.v.) on days -8 to -6; Cy (1.8 g/m²/day, injected i.v.) on days-5 and-4; and ATG (2.5 mg/kg/day) on days-5 to -2.

Treatment groups

307 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Bu/Flu/Cy/ATGExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Bu/Cy/ATGActive comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Transplant-related mortality (TRM)

TRM is defined as death due to any transplantation-related cause other than disease relapse. Transplant-related mortality will be calculated using a competing risks model.

Time frame
From HSCT to the follow-up assessment at 12 months post-treatment.

Secondary outcomes

1

Toxicity of conditioning

Toxicity of conditioning within 28 days of HSCT can be graded according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE): 1.Grade 1: Mild toxicity that does not require medical intervention. 2.Grade 2: Moderate toxicity that may require medical intervention. 3.Grade 3: Severe toxicity that requires significant medical intervention, hospitalization, or results in lasting effects. 4.Grade 4: Life-threatening toxicity, potentially requiring intensive care. 5.Grade 5: Death caused by the toxicity reaction.

Time frame
From HSCT to the follow-up assessment at 28 days and 100 days post-treatment.
2

Engraftment

Platelet engraftment was defined as the first of seven consecutive days with a platelet count \>20 × 109/L without transfusion support. Neutrophil engraftment was defined as the first of three consecutive days with an ANC \> 0.5 × 109/L.

Time frame
Platelet engraftment was assessment at 28 days post-transplantation.
3

GVHD

Acute GVHD was classified as symptom presentation before 100 days after haplo-HSCT and chronic GVHD was classified as symptom presentation \>100 days after haplo-HSCT. Each organ (skin, liver, and gut) was staged 1 through 4 for Acute GVHD according to modified criteria based on the schema of the Mount Sinai Acute GVHD International Consortium (MAGIC), and patients were also assigned a grade of acute GVHD (I through IV) based on overall severity. Chronic GVHD was graded in accordance with the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease Consensus Criteria.

Time frame
From HSCT to the follow-up assessment at 12 months post-treatment.
4

Overall Survival

The time from haplo-HSCT to death from any cause in patients with AML. Overall survival will be calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Time frame
From HSCT to the follow-up assessment at 12 months post-treatment.

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.