About this trial
The primary purpose of this study will be to determine if a CFs-Enriched Standard Care approach is an effective treatment for mechanical neck pain in terms of reducing pain and improving function. We hypothesize that a 4-week CFs-Enriched Standard Care approach will be superior to Standard Care alone in terms of patient-reported disability and pain, with measurements conducted using the Northwick Park Neck Pain Questionnaire and the Numeric Pain Rating Scale, respectively.
This will be an assessor-blinded, 2-group (1:1) randomized clinical trial aiming to enroll 94 participants with neck pain persisting for more than 4 weeks. Both groups will undergo 4 weeks of standard care twice weekly, following established clinical practice guidelines. In the intervention group, CFs will be enhanced, encompassing the physical, psychological, and social elements inherent in the clinical encounter, based on existing evidence.
The primary outcomes will encompass changes in Pain and Disability after 4 weeks of treatment, with a follow-up reassessment at week 12 post-treatment. Secondary outcomes will include changes in Active Range of Motion, Global Rating of Change, and Satisfaction with treatment. The change between groups after treatment and at the 12-week follow-up will be reported for all outcomes, considering the difference from scores recorded at baseline.
This study will be conducted at two sites in Buenos Aires, Argentina. Randomization will be stratified by site to ensure balanced allocation across centers.
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
Aged >18.
Neck pain for more than 4 weeks without signs or symptoms suggestive of major structural pathology.
Read, write, and understand the Spanish language.
Signed consent form.
Disqualifiers
Numeric Pain Reporting Scale (NPRS) < 3 points (to ensure the exclusion of patients with minor disorders).
Northwick Park Neck Pain Questionnaire (NPQ) < 10 points (to ensure the exclusion of patients with minor disorders).
History of cervical spine trauma, fracture, or surgical procedures.
Signs and symptoms of cervical myelopathy and/or cervical radiculopathy (to rule out cervical radicular pain, the Spurling Test, the Upper Limb Tension Test for the median nerve, and the Traction/Distraction test will be used).
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
Standard Care
Other interventionStandard Care includes exercises, mobilization, manual therapy, education, and Neck Wellness Home Care Guide (NWHCG). The rehabilitation program is based on current clinical practice guidelines aimed at reducing neck pain, improving range of motion, enhancing functionality, and promoting physical activity motivation. Each patient will receive active exercises and manual therapy techniques. Educational components will cover pain science, physical activity benefits, and return to normal activities , supplemented by a NWHCG. Treatment sessions will be conducted, featuring a one-to-one interaction between the participant and the physiotherapist. It will last 4 weeks, with two sessions per week, 45 minutes/session (8 treatment sessions).
Contextual Factors
BehavioralBundle of contextual factors divided into three categories: professional, treatment, and healthcare setting features. Regarding the professional contextual factors, they include reputation, appearance, and positive attitudes. The treatment contextual factors encompass positive attitudes, verbal communication, non-verbal communication, empathetic therapeutic alliance, therapeutic touch, and the use of a mirror to show the patient what is being performed. Finally, the healthcare setting contextual factors feature a comfortable setting, adequate environmental conditions, and appropriate design.
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Neck Pain Intensity
Neck pain intensity will be measured using a Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) composed of an 11-point scale, ranging from 0 ("no pain") to 10 ("the "worst pain imaginable") (Hawker et al., 2011; Kahl \& Cleland, 2005). In this study patients will be asked about their average pain intensity in the last 7 days (Jensen 1999).
Neck Disability
Neck disability will be measured using the Argentinian version of the Northwick Park Neck Pain Questionnaire (NPQ-AR) (Aguirre et al., 2013). The questionnaire has 9 items relating to daily activities (personal care, lifting, reading, headaches, concentration, work status, driving, sleeping and recreation) and cervical spine pain. Each item is scored from 0 to 4, the total score is 36; higher scores represent higher pain or disability.
Secondary outcomes
Active Range of Movement
AROM will be measured with the "clinometer" iPhone and/or Android app as described by Monreal (2021): Cervical flexion, extension, and lateral flexion measurements will be conducted with participants in a seated position
Global Rating of Change
The GROC is designed to quantify a patient's improvement or deterioration over time. It requires the subject to evaluate his or her current health status and compare it to his or her previous condition (Kamper et al., 2009). To assess this construct the 10th question of the NPQ will be used. This item has 5 categories: ''much worse'', "Slightly worse", "The same", "Slightly better" and ''much better'' (Aguirre 2013).
Satisfaction with treatment
Overall treatment satisfaction will be evaluated with question number 11 of the MedRisk questionnaire. (Beattie 2005) Patient will score from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree), the following sentence: "Overall, I am completely satisfied with the services I receive from my therapist" (Beattie 2005).
Expectations
Four questions, each corresponding to the specific intervention in the therapeutic plan (active exercises, manual therapy, education, and 'Neck Wellness Home Care Guide'), will be used to assess participants' expectations for the effectiveness of treatment. Participants will respond to the statement: 'I believe \[intervention\] will significantly help to improve this episode of my neck pain,' using a five-point scale: 'definitely agree,' 'agree,' 'neutral,' 'disagree,' and 'definitely disagree,' with 'neutral' representing the midpoint response (Bishop et al., 2013b).
Locations
2Map coordinates are unavailable for these locations. Locations are shown below instead.
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.