About this trial
This is a mixed-methods Hybrid Type 1 research design (efficacy study) in which we aim to conduct a two-arm randomized controlled trial and an Implementation Focused Process Evaluation of a culturally-targeted video and referral screening tool.
In this study, the investigators aim to evaluate the efficacy of a culturally targeted video previously developed by the research team vs. a Spanish-language fact sheet from an established group on enhancing genetic counseling and testing uptake and psychosocial outcomes in Latina women at risk for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer.
The investigators will test the video's efficacy while also gathering data on the implementation and future sustainability of using the Risk Screening Tool (RST) and video in community clinics.
Eligibility criteria
This trial accepts healthy volunteersQualifiers
Self-identify as a Latina woman
Be 18 years old or older
Be able to provide informed consent
Be fluent in Spanish
Disqualifiers
None
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
Culturally Targeted Narrative Video: "Is My Cancer Hereditary? Rosa Visits a Genetic Counselor."
BehavioralParticipants randomized to the video arm will receive a link with a password by email or text message to watch the video, depending on participants' preference. Participants without internet access will receive a DVD. Participants will be instructed to watch the video alone with no interruptions. We will ask them not to share the link with others.
FORCE Fact Sheet
BehavioralParticipants will receive a PDF of the fact sheet by email, text message, or a printed fact sheet by mail depending on participants' preferences. The fact sheet includes information about genes, breast cancer, risk factors for HBOC, genetic counseling and testing, and resources.
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Uptake of Genetic Counseling
Participants will self report whether they attended a genetic counseling session in the four months following their baseline survey. The study team will also have direct access to the genetic counseling company's records.
Uptake of Genetic Testing
Participants will self report whether they completed a genetic test for hereditary cancer in the four months following their baseline survey. The study team will also have direct access to the genetic counseling company's records.
Secondary outcomes
Knowledge about HBOC
9-item Scale from Kasting et al, 2019. The scale has statements to which participants respond True, False, or I don't Know. The scale is scored based on the accuracy of responses. A higher score indicates higher knowledge. Scores range from 0-9.
Self-efficacy about attending genetic cancer risk assessment
Change in self-efficacy about genetic counseling and testing will be measured by specific items from the Theory of Planned Behavior scale (Ajzen, 2002) on a scale from 1-7 -Not at all to 7- Extremely)
Beliefs and Attitudes about genetic cancer risk assessment
Changes in beliefs and attitudes about genetic counseling and genetic testing. The outcome will be assessed by 22 items from a scale developed by Sussner, Jandorf, Thompson et al., 2012 in which participants respond to a Likert-type scale from 1 (completely disagree) to 7 (completely agree).
Subjective norms about genetic cancer risk assessment
Change in subjective norms about genetic counseling and testing will be measured by specific items from the Theory of Planned Behavior scale (Ajzen, 2002) on a scale from 1-Not at all to 7- Extremely)
Other outcomes
Feasibility of the Referral Screening Tool
Qualitative measure captured through semi-structured interviews using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. (e.g., What barriers and facilitators did you experience while implementing the RST?)
Acceptability of the Referral Screening Tool
Qualitative measure captured through semi-structured interviews using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.
Adoption of the Referral Screening Tool
Qualitative measure captured through semi-structured interviews using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.
Sustainability of the Referral Screening Tool
Qualitative measure captured through semi-structured interviews using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
Georgetown University
Lead sponsor
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Collaborator
Virginia Commonwealth University
Collaborator