Continuous Vital Sign Monitoring in a Surgical Ward

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot listed
Trial typeObservational
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorUniversity Hospital, Akershus

About this trial

Unsafe patient care remains a major contributor to global morbidity and mortality. In surgical wards, postoperative patients are typically monitored intermittently using the National Early Warning Score (NEWS-2), leaving periods during which clinical deterioration may go undetected. Continuous vital sign monitoring (CVSM) using wearable sensors offers the potential for earlier identification of deterioration compared with intermittent assessments.

CVSM was introduced in a hospital ward as part of a hospital-initiated pilot implementation and is used alongside standard monitoring with NEWS-2. The purpose of the study is to evaluate this implementation.

This observational study uses a pragmatic, quasi-experimental, multi-method, longitudinal design. The overall aims of the study are to evaluate the impact of CVSM implementation on patient outcomes, to explore healthcare professionals' perceptions of patient safety culture, turnover intention and pleasure of work, and to describe their experiences with implementation.

Eligibility criteria

This trial accepts healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Patients aged 18 years or older admitted to the gastro-surgical ward.

Healthcare professionals aged 18 years or older employed in the participating wards for survey participation.

Nursing staff with at least 6 months of work experience and experience using CVSM for participation in qualitative focus group interviews.

Disqualifiers

Patients with delirium.

Patients with cognitive impairment interfering with sensor use.

Patients who decline participation.

Patients with allergy to electrode adhesives.

Trial population

The study population includes adult patients admitted to a gastro-surgical ward before and after implementation of continuous vital sign monitoring (CVSM), as well as adult patients admitted to a non-equivalent comparison ward at the same Norwegian teaching hospital. The study population also includes healthcare professionals working in these wards.

Trial design

Design model

Cohort

Time perspective

Other

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Continuous Vital Sign Monitoring (CVSM)

    Other intervention

    The intervention consists of continuous vital sign monitoring (CVSM) using wearable sensors applied to patients. A total of 16 sensors are implemented in a 29-bed gastro-surgical ward. The system continuously records patients' vital signs and transfers data to the electronic health record. Alerts are generated when predefined thresholds are exceeded and are delivered to nursing staff via smartphones and workstation monitors. The intervention is implemented in addition to usual practice with intermittent monitoring using the National Early Warning Score (NEWS-2), according to hospital protocol. Nursing staff receive training prior to implementation, and clinical responses to alerts are managed in accordance with hospital procedures. The intervention was implemented from September 2025 and continues during the study period.

Treatment groups

9,600 Participants
are divided into 3 treatment groups
Group A: Intervention ward1 intervention
Group B: Control group0 interventions
Group C: Non-equivalent comparison group0 interventions

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

NEWS-2 Associated with RRT Activation

National Early Warning Score 2 (NEWS2) associated with rapid response team (RRT) activation. NEWS2 is a physiological deterioration score ranging from 0 to 20 points. Higher scores indicate greater physiological deterioration and worse clinical status. According to hospital protocol, RRT consultation is recommended at NEWS2 ≥7. NEWS2 at the time of RRT activation will be assessed.

Time frame
Up to 12 months after implementation
2

Patient Safety Culture (N-HSOPSC 2.0)

Healthcare professionals' perceptions of patient safety culture measured as changes in the ten composite dimensions and two single-item measures of the Norwegian Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture (N-HSOPSC 2.0). Responses are recorded using 5-point Likert scales ranging from 1 to 5. Higher scores indicate more positive perceptions of patient safety culture.

Time frame
Baseline, 5 months, and 12 months after implementation
3

Nursing Staff Experiences with CVSM

Nursing staff experiences with the implementation and perceived usefulness of continuous vital sign monitoring (CVSM) for patient safety, explored through qualitative focus group interviews. This is a qualitative outcome measure and no numerical score will be calculated.

Time frame
Approximately 6 months after implementation

Secondary outcomes

1

Rapid Response Team (RRT) Activation

Number of Rapid Response Team (RRT) activation

Time frame
Up to 12 months after implementation
2

Unplanned Transfers to Higher Level of Care

Number of unplanned transfers to a higher level of care (intensive care unit or postoperative care unit)

Time frame
Up to 12 months after implementation
3

NEWS-2 at Time of Clinical Deterioration

National Early Warning Score 2 (NEWS2) measured at the time of unplanned transfer to a higher level of care. NEWS2 is a physiological deterioration score ranging from 0 to 20 points. Higher scores indicate greater physiological deterioration and worse clinical status.

Time frame
Up to 12 months after implementation
4

Hospital Length of Stay

Total hospital length of stay (hours)

Time frame
Up to 12 months after implementation

Other outcomes

Locations

1

Map coordinates are unavailable for these locations. Locations are shown below instead.

Akershus University Hospital HFRecruiting1478, Lørenskog, AkershusNorwayNorway

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

University Hospital, Akershus

Lead sponsor

Norwegian University of Science and Technology

Collaborator