Copeptin Measurement After Mannitol and Hypertonic Saline for the Diagnosis of Polyuria-polydipsia Syndrome

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorUniversity Hospital, Basel, Switzerland

About this trial

The aim of this study is to evaluate whether a new test using mannitol infusion can diagnose the cause of polyuria-polydipsia syndrome as accurately as the current standard test (hypertonic saline infusion) and to compare which test patients prefer. The goal is to identify a simpler and more patient-friendly diagnostic approach.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Age ≥ 18 years

Hypotonic polyuria/polydipsia syndrome defined as polyuria >40ml/kg body weight/24h and polydipsia >3l/24h; and urine osmolality <800mOsm/L or known AVP-D based on accepted criteria

Disqualifiers

Polyuria/polydipsia secondary to diabetes mellitus, hypercalcemia, or hypokalemia

Diagnosis of AVP-R (Copeptin > 21.4 pmol/L)

Evidence of acute illness

Epilepsy requiring treatment

Trial design

Design model

Crossover

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Mannitol

    Diagnostic test

    Intravenous infusion of 1.5g/kg body weight (max. 120g) mannitol is given over 30 minutes (≙ 7.5ml/kg body weight).

  • Hypertonic Saline

    Diagnostic test

    Intravenous infusion of NaCl 3% is given first as a bolus of 250ml over 15 minutes, then with an infusion rate of 0.15ml/kg body weight / minute (≙ 9ml/kg body weight/hour).

Treatment groups

144 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Mannitol InfusionExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Hypertonic Saline Infusion (HIS)Active comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Overall Diagnostic Accuracy

The overall diagnostic accuracy is defined as the proportion of correct diagnoses out of all diagnoses based on the stimulated copeptin value. Final diagnosis will be made after termination of the study by two endocrine specialists who will be blinded to the copeptin results of the mannitol infusion.

Time frame
One time assessment at Follow up Visit 2 (10 weeks after baseline)
2

Patient Test Preference

Patient-reported preference between mannitol infusion and hypertonic saline infusion, assessed using a 5-point Likert scale ranging from -2 (strong preference for hypertonic saline) to +2 (strong preference for mannitol).

Time frame
1 week after completion of both diagnostic tests

Secondary outcomes

1

Diagnostic Performance Measures for AVP-D

Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of mannitol infusion and hypertonic saline infusion for diagnosing AVP deficiency using predefined copeptin cut-offs.

Time frame
At completion of follow-up, 10 weeks after last diagnostic test
2

Diagnostic Performance Measures for PP

Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of mannitol infusion and hypertonic saline infusion for diagnosing PP using predefined copeptin cut-offs.

Time frame
At completion of follow-up, 10 weeks after last diagnostic test
3

Optimal copeptin cut-off after mannitol infusion

Exploratory determination and validation of optimal copeptin cut-off values for differentiating AVP deficiency from primary polydipsia following mannitol stimulation.

Time frame
At completion of follow-up, 10 weeks after last diagnostic test
4

Frequency and severity of clinical symptoms

Frequency and severity of symptoms (e.g., thirst, headache, nausea, malaise) assessed using numeric rating scales during mannitol and hypertonic saline tests.

Time frame
During each test day (baseline to end of monitoring period 90 minutes/ 240 minutes)

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.