Correlation Between Bedside Anatomical Indicators and Lifting Force and Glottic Exposure Under Different Video Laryngoscopy Techniques

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot listed
Trial typeObservational
Biological sexAll
Age18-75
SponsorSecond Hospital of Shanxi Medical University

About this trial

This single-center prospective observational study plans to enroll 196 patients undergoing elective general anesthesia. The study aims to investigate the correlation between preoperative bedside anatomical indicators (including modified Mallampati classification, upper lip bite test, mouth opening, head circumference, and thyromental distance) and the peak lifting force applied during video laryngoscopy, as well as the degree of glottic exposure (POGO score). The study will also evaluate the potential benefit of the direct epiglottis elevation technique in specific anatomical subgroups. After anesthesia induction, the same anesthesiologist will perform video laryngoscopy using two distinct techniques in a fixed sequence: the indirect (vallecula) method and the direct (subepiglottic) method. Peak lifting force will be quantitatively measured in real-time using a resistive thin-film pressure sensor attached to the laryngoscope blade. The primary outcomes are the POGO scores and peak lifting forces under both techniques. The secondary outcome includes the change in POGO score (ΔPOGO) between techniques. The study will provide quantitative evidence regarding the "anatomy-force-view" relationship and aid in individualized clinical decision-making for video laryngoscopy intubation.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

- Age 18 to 75 years

ASA physical status I to III

Scheduled for orotracheal intubation under video laryngoscopy guidance

Written informed consent obtained

Disqualifiers

Known history of difficult airway or anticipated need for awake intubation

Facial or neck trauma, burns, or surgical history affecting palpation of anatomical landmarks

Temporomandibular joint ankylosis or mouth opening < 2.0 cm

Edentulous patients

Trial population

Adult patients aged 18 to 75 years with ASA physical status I to III who are scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia requiring orotracheal intubation under video laryngoscopy guidance. Patients with known difficult airway, facial or neck abnormalities affecting landmark palpation, limited mouth opening (\< 2.0 cm), or edentulism are excluded.

Trial design

Design model

Cohort

Time perspective

Prospective

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Direct Epiglottis Elevation (Subepiglottic Method)

    Procedure/Surgery

    Video laryngoscopy blade tip advanced past the vallecula and placed under the laryngeal surface of the epiglottis to directly lift it.

Treatment groups

200 Participants
are divided into 1 treatment group
Group A: Patients Undergoing Video Laryngoscopy1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Peak Lifting Force with Direct Epiglottis Elevation

Peak lifting force (gf) measured by a resistive thin-film pressure sensor attached to the video laryngoscope blade during the direct (subepiglottic) technique.

Time frame
Perioperative
2

Peak Lifting Force with Indirect Epiglottis Elevation

Peak lifting force (gf) measured by a resistive thin-film pressure sensor attached to the video laryngoscope blade during the indirect (vallecula) technique.

Time frame
Perioperative
3

POGO Score with Indirect Epiglottis Elevation

Percentage of Glottic Opening (POGO) score assessed via video laryngoscopy using the indirect (vallecula) technique. The scale ranges from 0% to 100%, where higher scores indicate better visualization of the glottis (better outcome).

Time frame
Perioperative
4

POGO Score with Direct Epiglottis Elevation

Percentage of Glottic Opening (POGO) score assessed via video laryngoscopy using the direct (subepiglottic) technique. The scale ranges from 0% to 100%, where higher scores indicate better visualization of the glottis (better outcome).

Time frame
Perioperative

Secondary outcomes

1

Delta POGO (ΔPOGO)

Time frame
Perioperative
2

Incidence of Difficult Glottic Exposure

Time frame
Perioperative

Other outcomes

Locations

This trial has no locations.

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: