Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Home Polysomnography Made by Primary Care - (SONOPC Study)

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorEscola Superior de Ciencias da Saude

About this trial

The goal of this randomized clinical trial is to assess the cost-effectiveness of a home polyssomnography made by primary care compared to standard protocol for diagnosing obstructive sleep apnea in both genders. Researchers will compare if a polyssomnography made by primary care is more cost-effective than standard protocol to see if this strategy decrease the wait time to get this exam in public health system in Brazil .

Participants will undergo diagnostic screening using the STOP-BANG and Epworth questionnaires; following the identification of apnea risk, they will be randomized into two groups: one group will undergo the examination via the health department's scheduling system, while the other will do so through primary health care services at the unit closest to their residence.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

aged 18 years or older;

present clinical suspicion of OSA, confirmed by screening using the STOP-BANG and Epworth Sleepiness Scale questionnaires;

be receiving care at Basic Health Units (UBS), or be registered on the Central Regulation waiting list system for polysomnography (PSG);

Disqualifiers

use of home oxygen therapy;

use of invasive or non-invasive mechanical ventilation;

use of a tracheostomy;

change of residence during the data collection period;

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • home polysomnography made by health professionals in primary care

    Diagnostic test

    Participants will undergo diagnostic screening using the STOP-BANG and Epworth questionnaires; following the identification of apnea risk will undergo a home polysomnography through primary health care services at the unit closest to their residence.

  • Standard protocol

    Diagnostic test

    The patients undergo the polysomnography via the health department's scheduling system

Treatment groups

60 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Primary careExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Standard protocolActive comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER)

The ICER will be calculated by: Costs of primary care - Cost of the standard intervention)/(Effect of primary care - Effect of the standard intervention, where the effect be assessed by the time to the patients get the full diagnosis.

Time frame
baseline from 6 months

Secondary outcomes

1

Satisfaction level

Satisfaction level of each participant enrolled to do polysomnography evaluated by PCAtool in primary care or standard protocol

Time frame
6 months
2

Apnea-hypopnea Index (AHI)

To assess the diagnostic validity of a primary care home polysomnography compared with the standard polysomnography (PSG) in adults with clinically suspected Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA), based on the results of the Apnea-hypopnea Index (AHI).

Time frame
6 months
3

Time to full diagnosis

the spent time for the patients to get the full diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea

Time frame
Baseline to 6 months

Other outcomes

Locations

This trial has no locations.

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Escola Superior de Ciencias da Saude

Lead sponsor

University of Brasilia

Collaborator

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: