Cost-utility Analysis of Outpatient Manual Vacuum Aspiration Versus Operating Room Electric Aspiration for the Management of First-trimester Miscarriage

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexFemale
Age18-44
SponsorNantes University Hospital

About this trial

The ASPIR study aims to evaluate the cost-utility of outpatient manual vacuum aspiration compared with operating room electric aspiration for the management of first-trimester miscarriage. It is hypothesized that manual aspiration will demonstrate equivalent clinical efficacy and patient quality of life while reducing healthcare costs.

Eligibility criteria

Qualifiers

Female, aged 18-44 years

Ultrasound-confirmed first-trimester miscarriage requiring surgical management

Gestational age between 5 and 12 weeks of amenorrhea

Incomplete spontaneous abortion or ongoing non-viable pregnancy

Disqualifiers

Complete expulsion of pregnancy (endometrial thickness < 15 mm)

Choice of medical treatment with misoprostol

Elective termination of pregnancy

Unwanted pregnancy

Trial design

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Manual vacuum aspiration (MVA)
  • Electric aspiration (EA)

Treatment groups

860 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups

Sponsors and collaborators