About this trial
Arthroscopic hip surgery is being increasingly performed to treat both intraarticular and extraarticular hip diseases. Despite the minimally invasive approach, patients undergoing arthroscopic hip surgery still suffer severe pain due to the complex nature of hip innervation. Postoperative pain reduces patient satisfaction and delay patient recovery and discharge. The efficacy of regional anesthesia techniques in postoperative pain management have been proved in various surgeries. However, it remains controversial whether or not peripheral nerve blocks can significantly improve postoperative analgesia after hip arthroscopy.
Several studies have shown that the fascia iliac block cannot improve postoperative analgesia for hip arthroscopy because it blocks only some branches of the lumbar plexus but not the sacral plexus. Circum-Psoas Block (CPB) which has been defined in recent years is able to block the lumbar plexus nerves as well as sacral plexus such as the sciatic, superior gluteal, and inferior gluteal nerves. Therefore, the investigators predict that it can provide effective postoperative analgesia for hip arthroscopy. In this study, the researchers aim to investigate the effectiveness of CPB in hip arthroscopy.
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
Primary unilateral ambulatory hip arthroscopy
Age 18 to 70 years
ASA physical status I to III
Ability to follow the protocol.
Disqualifiers
Age <18 or >70 years of age
BMI above 40
Contraindications to peripheral nerve blockade
Pregnancy
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
Circum-psoas Block
Procedure/SurgeryUltrasound-guided circum-psoas block with 40 mL of treatment drug (Ropivacaine 0.2% \[local anesthetic\]) 30 minutes prior to induction of anesthesia.
Sham block
Procedure/SurgeryPerform ultrasound scanning without puncture.
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
pain severity at 6 hours postoperatively
Postoperative pain assessed with NRS pain score (NRS 0: no pain 10: pain as bad as can be) at 1, 6, 12, 24 hours postoperatively. However, to be more precise in our assessment, the effectiveness of each intervention was defined as a reduction in the pain at 6 hours postoperatively.
Secondary outcomes
Postoperative opioid consumption
Cumulative 24-hr postoperative opioid consumption
Postoperative nausea and vomiting
Nausea and vomiting intensity score measured by numeric rank score (0:no nausea and no vomiting, 1: have nausea, no vomiting, 2: once vomiting, 3: two or more vomiting).
neurologic evaluation
The dermatomal coverage of sensory block was evaluated by using a cool roller at 1, 6, 24 hours post-surgery. Motor strength was assessed by the following criteria (0: none; 1: muscle flicker without movement; 2: movement, but not against gravity; 3: movement against gravity; 4: movement against some resistance; 5: normal strength).
Patient satisfaction
Patient satisfaction measured using a numeric rating scale 0 to 10 (0 = unsatisfied; 10 =very satisfied)
Locations
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: