Crestal Bone Changes Following Equi-crestal Versus Subcrestal Implant Placement

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age21-60
SponsorMisr International University

About this trial

Statement of problem: The stability of peri-implant bone is a crucial factor for the long-term success of dental implants, where crestal bone plays a significant role in both the primary as well as the long- term implant stability. A bone loss of 1.5 mm during the first year of loading has been acceptable according to the early standards. However, more bone stability can be expected with the development in implant designs and surfaces over the past decades.

Aim of the study: the aim of this study is to radiographically assess the crestal bone changes following delayed implant placement in mandibular previously augmented posterior sites, comparing cases with equicrestal implant placement with subcrestal implant placement

Eligibility criteria

This trial accepts healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Patients older than 21 years.

Patients having augmented (by 50/50 particulate xenograft and autogenous bone) edentulous posterior site with vertical bone height of > 10 mm in the mandible with a width of ridge ≥ 7 mm

Adequate Inter-arch space for implant placement

Favorable occlusion (no traumatic occlusion).

Disqualifiers

Patients with inadequate bone volume and/ or quality

Patients with remaining roots or with signs of acute infection related to the area of interest.

Patients having systemic conditions that interfere with normal wound healing

Patients with habits that may jeopardize the implant longevity and affect the results of the study such as parafunctional habits .

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Subcrestal implant placement

    Procedure/Surgery

    Delayed implant placement 2 mm subcrestally in missing mandibular posterior site.

  • Crestal implant placement

    Procedure/Surgery

    Delayed implant placement equicrestally in missing mandibular posterior site.

Treatment groups

28 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Subcrestal implant placementActive comparator 1 intervention
Group B: Crestal implant placementActive comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Crestal bone changes

Periapical digital radiographs to determine the amount of crestal bone lose in mm

Time frame
at baseline,3, 6 ,12 and 18 months

Secondary outcomes

1

Keratinized tissue width

Keratinized tissue width using periodontal probe in mm

Time frame
at baseline, 3,6,12 and 18 months
2

Patient satisfaction

Questionnaire

Time frame
at baseline, 6 ,12 and 18 months

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.