The investigators verify the reliability and practicality of the Chinese adaptation results of QoLAF-Q, which helps Chinese doctors better master the methods and techniques of quality of life assessment.
meeting the diagnostic criteria for anal fistula in the "Diagnostic Criteria for Anal Fistula (2004 Edition)", and being diagnosed through clinical examinations, digital rectal examinations, anorectal ultrasound, MRI, and other examinations;
being 18 years old or above;
having clear consciousness and being able to understand and cooperate to complete the questionnaire survey;
voluntarily signing the informed consent form.
having other serious anorectal diseases, such as anal fissure, rectal prolapse, colorectal cancer, etc.;
having severe dysfunction of important organs such as the heart, liver, and kidneys;
suffering from mental diseases or having cognitive impairments;
having undergone anorectal surgery or other major surgeries that may affect the quality of life recently (within 3 months).
anal fistula patients who visited the anorectal surgery wards and outpatient departments of tertiary hospitals across the country
Cohort
Cross-sectional
Anal fistula surgery
Procedure/SurgeryAnal fistula incision, anal fistula excision, anal fistula hanging
Cronbach's α coefficient
Reliability analysis was used to study the reliability and precision of the responses to quantitative data (especially the attitude scale questions).The Cronbach's α coefficient is a commonly used reliability index, which measures the correlation between various items in the scale and determines whether each item in the scale is measuring the same concept or trait. If the Cronbach's alpha coefficient is high, it indicates that the correlation among the items is strong, and the internal consistency of the scale is good, meaning that these items can relatively consistently reflect the psychological trait or concept being measured.In the reliability analysis of this study, if the Cronbach's α coefficient reaches above 0.8, it indicates that each item can effectively revolve around the core concept of "the quality of life of patients with anal fistula", and there is a high degree of consistency among these items.
KMO value
Validity analysis is used to study the rationality of the design of quantitative data (especially items in attitude scales). For the validity analysis of this scale, it is required to use the KMO value to determine whether the data obtained after converting the subjective choices of patients into Likert scale scores are reasonable and whether they can be used for factor analysis, so as to judge the appropriateness of information extraction and verify the validity level of the data.
Factor analysis of QoLAF-Q(quality of life in patients with anal fistula questionnaire)
The factor analysis of the Quality of Life in Anal Fistula Questionnaire (QoLAF-Q) is used to verify the applicability of QoLAF-Q in China through cross-cultural research, which includes two parts: exploratory factor analysis(EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis(CFA). EFA extracts the latent factors in the scale through methods such as principal component analysis to determine the structural dimensions of the scale.Based on EFA, CFA uses structural equation modeling to verify the structure of the scale and further evaluate the construct validity of the scale. By comparing the model fit indices, such as the chi-square to degrees of freedom ratio (χ²/df), goodness-of-fit index (GFI), etc, the degree of fit between the model and the data is judged.When the various indicators in the factor analysis of QoLAF-Q are basically higher than the predicted values, it indicates that the QoLAF has good applicability for the assessment of Chinese patients.
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options:
