Custom-Made Titanium Plates Versus Custom-Made Polyether Ether Ketone (PEEK) Plates

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18-50
SponsorMansoura University

About this trial

Mandibular fractures represent a significant portion of maxillofacial trauma, primarily resulting from motor vehicle accidents, interpersonal violence, and sports-related injuries. Achieving successful treatment requires accurate anatomical reduction, stable internal fixation, and restoration of pre-traumatic occlusion and masticatory function . Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) using titanium miniplates has long served as the gold standard for mandibular fracture management due to their superior mechanical strength, excellent biocompatibility, and proven structural reliability .

Despite their widespread clinical adoption, conventional titanium plates present notable drawbacks. Their high elastic modulus compared to human cortical bone often leads to stress shielding, which can impede normal bone healing and cause local osteopenia .Additionally, titanium hardware can cause temperature sensitivity, scatter artifacts on computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans, and may necessitate secondary surgical removal due to palpability or infection .

To address these limitations, Polyether Ether Ketone (PEEK)-a high-performance thermoplastic polymer has emerged as a promising alternative biomaterial in maxillofacial surgery. PEEK exhibits an elastic modulus close to natural bone, thereby reducing stress shielding and promoting physiological strain distribution during fracture healing. Furthermore, PEEK is radiolucent, non-magnetic, and chemically inert, allowing artifact-free postoperative radiologic assessment .

With advancements in digital dentistry, computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) alongside 3D printing have enabled the fabrication of patient-specific, custom-made implants. Custom-made titanium and PEEK plates eliminate the need for intraoperative manual bending, significantly reducing surgical time, improving contour accuracy, and enhancing mechanical stability across the fracture site . While custom-made titanium provides rigid fixation suitable for high-load zones, custom-made PEEK implants offer an biomechanically compatible and artifact-free alternative.

However, direct comparative clinical and biomechanical evaluations between custom-made titanium and custom-made PEEK plates for mandibular fracture fixation remain limited. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate and compare the clinical outcome, stability, and surgical efficiency of custom-made titanium versus custom-made PEEK plates in the fixation of mandibular fractures.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Patients age ranging from 18 to 50 years.

Unilateral and/or bilateral simple or compound fractures of the mandibular symphysis, parasymphysis or body regions that are displaced and require open reduction with internal fixation.

The fractures must be recent, having occurred no longer than 10 days prior to the surgical treatment.

Healthy patients who are classified according to the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification as class I.

Disqualifiers

Patients suffer from pathological fractures.

Comminuted and infected fractures.

Fracture of the atrophic edentulous ridge

Old mandibular fractures (more than 10 days).

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Custom-Made Titanium Plate

    Device

    Custom-made titanium plate used for fixation of mandibular fractures.

  • Custom-Made PEEK Plate

    Device

    Custom-made polyether ether ketone (PEEK) plate used for fixation of mandibular fractures.

Treatment groups

32 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Custom-Made Titanium PlateExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Custom-Made PEEK PlateExperimental treatment 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

number of patients with adequate reduction of the fractured segment

will be determined by an assessment of the inferior border of the mandible as follows: 1. Excellent reduction: whenever alignment of the inferior border of mandible will be maintained across the fracture line. 2. Good reduction: if a discrepancy of 1-3 mm is noted. 3. Fair reduction: if a discrepancy of 3-5mm is noted. 4. Poor reduction: if the discrepancy is \> 5 mm.

Time frame
immediately and 6 months after the surgery consequently

Secondary outcomes

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.