Daphnetin Capsule In the Treatment of VaScular COgnitive Impairment Without Dementia

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age50-80
SponsorFirst People's Hospital of Shenyang

About this trial

The purpose of this clinical trial is to understand and evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of Daphnetin Capsule in patients with vascular cognitive impairment. Changes in the Vascular Dementia Assessment Scale-cog(VADAS-cog) at 6 months were evaluated. Although Daphnetin has a dual neurovascular protective effect, however, there is still a lack of relevant high-quality studies on its role in patients with vascular cognitive impairment, especially in patients with vascular cognitive impairment in non-dementia (VCI-ND), whether it has a role in improving cognitive status needs to be urgently explored in high-quality clinical studies. Researchers are comparing Daphnetin to placebo (a drug-free analog) to see if Daphnetin is effective in treating vascular cognitive impairment. Participants will take either Daphnetin or placebo daily for six months, with follow-up visits every three months and completion of a case report form.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Be 50-80 years of age (both ends included)

Have a complaint of cognitive impairment involving memory and/or other cognitive domains that has persisted for at least 3 months

Have a cognitive level that is neither normal nor demented according to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, Criteria ( DSM-V criteria), a Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA scale) score <26 and ≥18, and a Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) scale score of ≥0.5 in at least one domain and an overall CDR score ≤1

Have a cognitive level that is neither normal nor demented according to DSM-V criteria, a MoCA scale score <26 and ≥18, and a CDR scale score of ≥0.5 in at least one domain and an overall CDR score ≤1

Disqualifiers

Previously diagnosed dementia; vascular cognitive impairment not associated with a condition other than dementia that may affect cognition

Acute stroke event within 6 months

Previously diagnosed hereditary or inflammatory small vessel disease

Presence of congenital mental retardation and severe neurological or psychiatric disorders

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Daphnetin Capsule

    Drug

    Daphnetin, chemically known as 7,8-dihydroxycoumarin, also known as ZuShiMaJiaSu, is a class of coumarin derivatives derived from different Daphnetin genus plant .

  • Placebo

    Drug

    The placebo is a Daphnetin Capsule simulants

Treatment groups

206 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: DaphnetinExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: PlaceboPlacebo comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Changes in Vascular Dementia Assessment Scale-cognitive subscale (VADAS-cog)

Vascular Dementia Assessment Scale-cognitive subscale(VADAS-cog) is a revision of the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-cog) to be a better measure in vascular conditions,The lowest score is 0, with higher scores representing higher levels of cognitive dysfunction and poorer status of the patient.

Time frame
6 months

Secondary outcomes

1

Incidence of combined endpoints: including new stroke (ischemic Trial of ORG 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment typing [TOAST typing] or hemorrhagic)/transient ischemic attack, myocardial infarction, new-onset dementia, death

For categorical indicators, the stratified Cochran- Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) test will be used for analysis.

Time frame
6 months
2

Incidence of each individual event of the combined endpoint

For categorical indicators, the stratified Cochran- Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) test will be used for analysis.

Time frame
6 months
3

Clinician Interview-Based studies Impression of Change scale-plus version(CIBIC-Plus) of change

Consists of three parts The clinician's impression of change is an assessment of change from baseline, not an assessment of severity. The clinician may refer to his/her own baseline information compiled in Part I when making the assessment of change. The clinician's assessment of impression of change should then be replicated in the main study case report form.The score of CIBIC-plus ranges from 1 to 7, and the score of 1-3 indicates improvement, 4 means no changed, and 5-7 indicates worse.

Time frame
6 months
4

Change in the Brief Mental State Evaluation Scale (MMSE)

Each correct item is scored as 1 point, and errors are scored as 0 points. The total score ranges from 0 to 30, and the cut-off value for normal and abnormal is related to the level of education; ≤17 points for the illiterate (no education) group, ≤20 points for the elementary school (≤6 years of education) group, and ≤24 points for the secondary school or above (\>6 years of education) group. Cognitive deficits are considered to be below the cut-off value and normal above it.

Time frame
6 months

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

First People's Hospital of Shenyang

Lead sponsor

Fourth People's Hospital of Shenyang

Sponsor institution

Fourth People's Hospital of Shenyang

Collaborator