Development of A Self-Assessment Tool for Personalized Preventive Periodontal Care Among the Saudi Population Using Semi-Supervised Learning

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot listed
Trial typeObservational
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorUniversiti Sains Malaysia

About this trial

This observational study will collect labeled data to assess the accuracy of an online periodontal self-assessment tool in adults. Participants will complete the questionnaire and then undergo a clinical periodontal examination during the same visit. The study will compare questionnaire-based results with clinical examination results to evaluate diagnostic accuracy and agreement.

Eligibility criteria

This trial accepts healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Adult aged 18 years or older

Able to read and understand the study information and provide informed consent

Able to complete the online questionnaire independently (on a smartphone/tablet/computer)

Willing to undergo a same-visit clinical periodontal examination

Disqualifiers

Completely edentulous (no natural teeth)

Currently undergoing active periodontal treatment (e.g., scaling and root planing) or received periodontal therapy within the past [6 months]

Took systemic antibiotics within the past [3 months]

Unable to complete the questionnaire or examination due to cognitive impairment, severe illness, or communication barriers that prevent informed consent

Trial population

Participants will be selected from members of the general public who are scheduled for dental screening appointments at Asir Specialized Dental Center, Abha, Saudi Arabia. Recruitment and study procedures will take place at the center during the scheduled screening visit.

Trial design

Design model

Cohort

Time perspective

Prospective

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Online periodontal self-assessment questionnaire and clinical periodontal examination (reference standard)

    Other intervention

    Participants complete an online self-assessment questionnaire and undergo a same-visit clinical periodontal examination to assign a reference-standard periodontal risk category (low/medium/high). No therapeutic intervention is assigned as part of this observational study.

Treatment groups

No treatment groups listed

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Agreement between self-assessment risk category and clinical periodontal risk category

Agreement between the questionnaire-derived periodontal risk category and the reference-standard clinical periodontal risk category assigned during the same visit. Both classifications will use three ordered categories: low risk, medium risk, and high risk. Agreement will be summarized using weighted kappa and the proportion of exact matches. Weighted kappa ranges from -1 to 1, where 1 indicates perfect agreement, 0 indicates agreement equivalent to chance, and values below 0 indicate less agreement than expected by chance.

Time frame
Same visit (baseline)
2

Overall Diagnostic Accuracy of Self-Assessment Tool for Periodontal Risk Classification

Overall diagnostic accuracy of the questionnaire-derived periodontal risk classification compared with the clinical reference-standard periodontal risk classification. Accuracy will be calculated as the proportion of correctly classified participants among all participants. The value ranges from 0 to 1, where higher values indicate better classification performance.

Time frame
Same visit (baseline)
3

Sensitivity and Specificity for High-Risk Periodontal Disease Detection

Sensitivity and specificity of the self-assessment questionnaire for identifying high-risk periodontal status compared with the clinical reference-standard classification. High-risk periodontal status will be compared against non-high-risk status, which includes low-risk and medium-risk categories. Sensitivity and specificity each range from 0 to 1, where higher values indicate better diagnostic performance

Time frame
Same visit (baseline)
4

Macro-Averaged F1-Score for Periodontal Risk Classification

Macro-averaged F1-score across the three periodontal risk categories: low risk, medium risk, and high risk. The F1-score is the harmonic mean of precision and recall, calculated separately for each risk category and then averaged equally across categories. The macro-averaged F1-score ranges from 0 to 1, where higher values indicate better classification performance.

Time frame
Same visit (baseline)

Secondary outcomes

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.