Differential Target Multiplexed Spinal Cord Stimulation

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot listed
Trial typeObservational
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorMoens Maarten

About this trial

Evaluation of the effectiveness of differential target multiplexed spinal cord stimulation for treatment of chronic back and leg pain. Additionally, a subgroup analysis will be performed to evaluate potential differences between paddle/surgical leads versus percutaneous leads.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Patients with severe chronic pain (> 5 on numeric rating scale, NRS) for at least 6 months due to FBSS (PSPS T2) and suitable for treatment with DTM SCS according to the treating physician

Age > 18 years

Patient has been informed of the study procedures and has given written informed consent

Patient willing to comply with study protocol including attending the study visits

Disqualifiers

Expected inability of the patient to receive or properly operate the spinal cord stimulation system

History of coagulation disorder, lupus erythematosus, diabetic neuropathy, rheumatoid arthritis, or morbus Bechterew

Active malignancy

Addiction to drugs, alcohol (>5 units per day) and/or medication

Trial population

Patients with chronic back and leg pain due to Failed Back Surgery Syndrome (FBSS)/Persistent Spinal Pain Syndrome type 2 (PSPS-T2), who will receive treatment with differential target multiplexed (DTM) SCS.

Trial design

Design model

Cohort

Time perspective

Prospective

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Spinal Cord Stimulation

    Device

    differential target multiplexed stimulation

Treatment groups

250 Participants
are divided into 1 treatment group
Group A: Spinal cord stimulation1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Overall pain intensity with Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

Overall pain, defined as a combination of back and leg pain, but not pain from other body parts, measured with the VAS (100mm)

Time frame
The change between the baseline screening and the evaluation 1 month after DTM stimulation, 6 months and 12 months

Secondary outcomes

1

Back pain intensity with Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

Time frame
The change between the baseline screening and the evaluation 1 month after DTM stimulation, 6 months and 12 months
2

Leg pain intensity with Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

Time frame
The change between the baseline screening and the evaluation 1 month after DTM stimulation, 6 months and 12 months
3

Pain medication use

Open question regarding the dosage, frequency and type of pain medication

Time frame
The change between the baseline screening and the evaluation 1 month after DTM stimulation, 6 months and 12 months
4

Functional disability

The functional disabilities will be assessed with the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)

Time frame
The change between the baseline screening and the evaluation 1 month after DTM stimulation, 6 months and 12 months

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Moens Maarten

Lead sponsor

Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel

Sponsor institution