Direct Versus Video Laryngoscopy in Patients With Acromegaly

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot listed
Trial typeObservational
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorMuzaffer GENCER

About this trial

Acromegaly is associated with craniofacial skeletal changes and upper airway soft tissue hypertrophy, which may increase the risk of difficult laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation. This prospective observational study aims to evaluate airway and intubation characteristics in patients with acromegaly undergoing surgery under general anesthesia and to compare direct laryngoscopy and video laryngoscopy findings.

Adult patients with acromegaly and patients with nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas scheduled for surgery under general anesthesia will be prospectively enrolled between July 1, 2026, and August 31, 2026. Preoperative airway assessment parameters, hormonal data including growth hormone and insulin-like growth factor-1 levels, Mallampati score, modified Cormack-Lehane grade, intubation-related variables, and peri-intubation complications will be recorded.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Age 18 years or older

Diagnosis of acromegaly and scheduled for surgery after evaluation by the institutional pituitary diseases council

Diagnosis of nonfunctioning pituitary adenoma and scheduled for surgery after evaluation by the institutional pituitary diseases council

Requirement for general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation

Disqualifiers

Age younger than 18 years

Refusal to participate in the study

Presence of extrapituitary malignancy

Emergency surgery

Trial population

Adult patients with acromegaly or nonfunctioning pituitary adenoma who are evaluated by the institutional pituitary diseases council and scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia requiring endotracheal intubation at Basaksehir Cam and Sakura City Hospital.

Trial design

Design model

Cohort

Time perspective

Prospective

Treatments tested in this trial

Not listed

Trial groups

40 Participants
are grouped into 2 trial groups
Group A: Acromegaly Group
Group B: Nonfunctioning Pituitary Adenoma Group

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Modified Cormack-Lehane Grade With Direct and Video Laryngoscopy

The modified Cormack-Lehane grade obtained during direct laryngoscopy and video laryngoscopy will be recorded and compared to evaluate glottic visualization and the degree of laryngoscopic difficulty.

Time frame
During tracheal intubation procedure

Secondary outcomes

1

Mallampati Classification Score

The preoperative Mallampati Classification score will be recorded as part of the routine airway assessment and evaluated for its association with difficult laryngoscopy or difficult intubation. The Mallampati Classification ranges from Class I to Class IV, with a minimum value of Class I and a maximum value of Class IV. Higher scores indicate poorer visualization of the oropharyngeal structures and a worse airway assessment, reflecting a greater likelihood of difficult laryngoscopy or difficult intubation.

Time frame
Preoperative airway assessment before induction of anesthesia
2

Time to Successful Intubation

Time to successful intubation will be defined as the time, measured in seconds, from insertion of the laryngoscope into the oral cavity to confirmation of endotracheal tube placement by capnography.

Time frame
During tracheal intubation procedure
3

Number of Intubation Attempts

The total number of laryngoscopy attempts required for successful endotracheal intubation will be recorded. An intubation attempt will be defined as each insertion of the laryngoscope into the oral cavity with the intention of endotracheal tube placement.

Time frame
During tracheal intubation procedure
4

Need for Adjunct Airway Maneuvers or Devices

The need for adjunct airway maneuvers or devices will be recorded as a binary outcome, defined as whether any additional airway maneuver or device is required to achieve successful endotracheal intubation. Adjuncts may include external laryngeal manipulation, stylet, bougie, change of laryngoscope, supraglottic airway device, or fiberoptic bronchoscopy.

Time frame
From induction of anesthesia until confirmation of successful endotracheal tube placement by capnography during the airway management procedure

Other outcomes

Locations

This trial has no locations.

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Muzaffer GENCER

Lead sponsor

Başakşehir Çam & Sakura City Hospital

Sponsor institution

Başakşehir Çam & Sakura City Hospital

Collaborator

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: