DISS vs FANS in Suction-Assisted RIRS for Medium-Sized Renal Stones

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18-60
SponsorAin Shams University

About this trial

Kidney stones are a common health problem and may recur frequently, which can affect quality of life and kidney function. Retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) is a minimally invasive treatment used for renal stones, but treatment of medium-sized stones may be associated with longer operative time, impaired visibility during surgery, residual stone fragments, and postoperative infectious complications caused by increased intrarenal pressure.

Suction-assisted retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) techniques have been developed to improve surgical efficiency and safety by facilitating continuous removal of stone fragments and helping control intrarenal pressure. Two commonly used suction-assisted approaches are direct in-scope suction (DISS) and flexible and navigable suction ureteric access sheath (FANS). However, there is limited prospective randomized evidence directly comparing these two techniques.

This randomized prospective clinical study aims to compare direct in-scope suction (DISS) versus flexible and navigable suction ureteric access sheath (FANS) in adult patients with medium-sized renal stones measuring 2 to 3 cm who are undergoing retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS). Participants will be randomly assigned to one of the two suction-assisted techniques. The study will evaluate whether flexible and navigable suction ureteric access sheath (FANS) provides better outcomes than direct in-scope suction (DISS) in terms of stone-free rate and postoperative infection rate.

The primary outcome is stone-free status assessed by postoperative imaging. Secondary outcomes include operative time, intraoperative visibility, and postoperative complications, particularly infection and urosepsis. The study hypothesis is that suction-assisted retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) using the flexible and navigable suction ureteric access sheath (FANS) technique will result in a higher stone-free rate and a lower postoperative infection rate compared with direct in-scope suction (DISS) in the management of medium-sized renal stones.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Adults aged 18 to 60 years

Radiologically confirmed renal stones measuring 2 to 3 centimeters

Eligible for retrograde intrarenal surgery

Normal renal function as evidenced by normal serum creatinine

Disqualifiers

Pregnancy or lactation

Active urinary tract infection at the time of enrollment

Bleeding disorders or coagulopathies that contraindicate surgical intervention

Anatomical malformations affecting the urinary tract

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Direct In-Scope Suction

    Procedure/Surgery

    Direct suction is applied through the working channel of the flexible ureteroscope during retrograde intrarenal surgery to facilitate evacuation of stone fragments and improve intraoperative visibility during laser lithotripsy.

  • Flexible and Navigable Suction Ureteric Access Sheath

    Procedure/Surgery

    A flexible and navigable suction ureteric access sheath is used during retrograde intrarenal surgery to provide suction-assisted evacuation of stone fragments, improve visibility, and support intrarenal pressure control during laser lithotripsy.

Treatment groups

126 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: In-Scope Suction GroupExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Flexible and Navigable Suction Ureteric Access Sheath GroupExperimental treatment 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Stone-Free Rate

Stone-free status will be assessed by postoperative imaging using kidney, ureter, and bladder radiography and non-contrast computed tomography. Clinically insignificant residual fragments will be defined as residual fragments measuring 2 to 3 millimeters or less.

Time frame
At 1 month after surgery

Secondary outcomes

1

Postoperative Infection Rate

The proportion of participants who develop any postoperative infectious complications.

Time frame
Within 1 month after surgery
2

Operative Time

Operative time measured in minutes from ureteroscope insertion to successful placement of the double-J ureteral stent.

Time frame
During surgery (Intraoperatively)
3

Intraoperative Visibility Score

Intraoperative visibility will be graded by the operating surgeon using a 3-point scale: grade 0 for poor visibility, grade 1 for moderate visibility, and grade 2 for good visibility.

Time frame
During surgery (Intraoperatively)
4

Postoperative Complication Rate

The proportion of participants with postoperative complications classified according to the Clavien-Dindo classification system.

Time frame
Within 1 month after surgery

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: