Doctor-patient Partnerships: the Key to a Better Standard of Medical Advice?

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot listed
Trial typeObservational
Biological sexAll
Age21-99
SponsorSingapore General Hospital

About this trial

Background: The current legal standard of advice in Singapore has three components: distinction of advice from the other parts of clinical consultation (i.e. diagnosis and treatment) for the purpose of standard setting, categories of information that need to be disclosed to patients and how the adequacy of this information is judged in court. A review of empirical data shows that information deficit is not the only or most pressing concern in decision-making from the patients' perspective. The data also reflects the value that is placed on relationships that patients have with their treating doctors. Features of a good doctor-patient relationship can be found in partnerships, which are based on therapeutic alliance and mutuality.

Objective: To develop a contextual understanding of the role of clinical partnerships in Singapore, empirical data is needed from both patients and healthcare workers on their understanding and interpretation of doctor-patient partnerships and how medical decisions are made using this relationship.

Design: A qualitative study using interpretive analysis of semi-structured interviews conducted via in-person, telephone and videoconferencing interviews.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Recruitment of all participants will be through the Singapore General Hospital ambulatory clinic or general ward.

Disqualifiers

None of the above

Trial population

Patients with chronic lung disease and healthcare professionals who care for them

Trial design

Design model

Other

Time perspective

Prospective

Treatments tested in this trial

  • In depth Interview

    Other intervention

    In depth Interviews

Treatment groups

300 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Patients with Chronic Lung Disease1 intervention
Group B: Healthcare professionals1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Descriptions of decision-making and relationships

As above

Time frame
5 years

Secondary outcomes

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.