Dual-function Semirigid Thoracoscopy Versus Rigid Thoracoscopy for the Diagnosis of Pleural Disease

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorChina-Japan Friendship Hospital

About this trial

Medical thoracoscopy (rigid and semirigid) is an effective, safe method for diagnosing and managing pleural diseases. Rigid thoracoscopy demonstrates superior overall diagnostic yield compared to semirigid techniques (flexible forceps/cryobiopsy) due to its ability to obtain larger, deeper biopsies with rigid forceps. However, diagnostic rates become similar when biopsies are successfully obtained.

Limitations of rigid thoracoscopy include restricted maneuverability (especially in posterior/mediastinal areas), increased procedural pain from leveraging against ribs and larger trocars, higher sedation requirements, and a steep learning curve for pulmonologists.

To address these issues, a novel dual-function semirigid thoracoscope (UE FET-680, China) was developed. Its straight working channel accommodates standard rigid biopsy forceps, potentially matching rigid thoracoscopy's diagnostic yield while improving usability. This randomized trial will compare the efficacy and safety of this new device versus conventional rigid thoracoscopy in undiagnosed exudative pleural effusions.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Age ≥ 18 years;

Patients with unilateral pleural effusion of unclear aetiology after less invasive means of diagnosis;

Fully informed of the purpose and method of the study, agreed to participate in the study, and signed the informed consent form.

Disqualifiers

Patients with PaO2/FiO2 <300;

Patients with a tendency for uncontrolled bleeding, unstable cardiovascular status or severe heart failure;

Patients with complete pleural symphysis, where it was not possible to create a pneumothorax, were excluded subsequently;

Patients with refractory cough;

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Dual-function semi-rigid thoracoscopy

    Device

    Patients received pleural biopsy via dual-function semi-rigid thoracoscopy.

  • Rigid thoracoscopy

    Device

    Patients received pleural biopsy via rigid thoracoscopy.

Treatment groups

92 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Dual-function Semi-rigid ThoracoscopyExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Rigid ThoracoscopyOther 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Diagnostic yield

Diagnostic yield is defined as the percentage of participants for whom the allocated thoracoscopic pleural biopsy provides a specific histopathological diagnosis. Malignant pleural disease and other defined histopathological diagnoses will be classified as diagnostic results. Non-specific pleuritis, fibrinous pleuritis, non-interpretable specimens, and cases in which no biopsy is obtained will be classified as non-diagnostic results.

Time frame
7 days after the procedure.

Secondary outcomes

1

Procedural Sedative and Analgesic Requirements

Procedural sedative and analgesic requirements will be assessed by recording the total dose of each sedative or analgesic agent administered during thoracoscopy, including midazolam, pentazocine, and tramadol. The dose of each agent will be recorded separately in milligrams and summarised by treatment group

Time frame
The day of thoracoscopy.
2

Disease-specific Diagnostic Sensitivity

Disease-specific diagnostic sensitivity is defined as the percentage of participants with a specific final diagnosis according to the reference standard whose allocated thoracoscopic pleural biopsy provides a specific histopathological diagnosis supporting the same disease. Participants with non-specific biopsy findings who are subsequently diagnosed with malignant pleural disease or tuberculous pleuritis during follow-up will be classified as false-negative biopsy results for the corresponding disease.

Time frame
Up to 12 months after thoracoscopy.
3

Sampling Quality of Pleural Biopsy Specimens

Sampling quality will be assessed using specimen size, specimen depth, and specimen interpretability. Specimen size will be measured as the largest cross-sectional area of the processed biopsy specimens on microscopic glass slides using ImageJ software and reported in square millimetres. Specimen depth will be assessed according to the presence of thoracic wall fatty tissue. Specimen interpretability will be classified as easily interpretable, interpretable with some difficulty, interpretable with great difficulty, or non-interpretable.

Time frame
Up to 4 weeks after thoracoscopy.
4

Procedure Duration

Procedure duration will be measured in minutes from skin incision to completion of chest tube placement and wound closure.

Time frame
The day of thoracoscopy.

Other outcomes

1

Postprocedural Length of Hospital Stay

Postprocedural length of hospital stay is defined as the number of days from the date of thoracoscopy to hospital discharge.

Time frame
At discharge from the index hospitalization, up to 30 days after thoracoscopy.
2

Direct Medical Costs During the Index Hospitalization

Direct medical costs during the index hospitalization will be extracted from hospital billing records. These costs include procedure-related costs, anaesthetic and analgesic medication costs, chest tube and drainage-related costs, postprocedural imaging and management costs, and postprocedural hospitalization costs. Costs will be reported in Chinese Yuan.

Time frame
At discharge from the index hospitalization, up to 30 days after thoracoscopy.

Locations

This trial has no locations.

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: