Dynamic Assessment of the Risk for Language and Reading Disorders in Monolingual and Multilingual Children

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age4-9
SponsorIRCCS Eugenio Medea

About this trial

The project represents the completion of a part of the recently concluded European project MultiMind, in which a computer platform called MuLiMi was developed and validated. The platform hosts screening tests for the identification of the risk of Language and Learning Disorders in preschool and primary school children, respectively. The aim is to validate the Dynamic Assessment (DA) tests (a first test assessing the capacity to learn new words for preschool children and a second one assessing the capacity to learn a new spelling code for school-age children) in a population of monolingual and bilingual children attending preschool and primary school. The main goal of the study is to complete the validation of the two Dynamic Assessment tests implemented in the MuLiMi platform developed for the MultiMind project.

Eligibility criteria

This trial accepts healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

age 4-6 years (Kindergarten) or 7-9 years (Primary school);

Attendance at an Italian-language school in Italy or Switzerland/Germany.

(i) At least one parent speaks at least one language other than Italian in the family;

(ii) Continuous exposure to the Italian language for at least two years.

Disqualifiers

Intellectual disability, major psychopathological disorders, exposure to Italian language for less than two years.

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • computerized Dynamic Assessment

    Diagnostic test

    The DA tests (with a duration of about 30 minutes) can be administered by accessing the digital platform MuLiMi, individually with the experimenter or examiner. The tests are in game form and require children to learn the names of characters presented in the context of stories (preschool version) or to learn new codes for reading and writing (primary school version). In both cases, the new materials (names or codes) are repeatedly presented to the child until (s)he reaches an accuracy threshold. The number of repetitions needed to reach the threshold constitutes the main measure of the child's learning capacity, together with the number of errors committed during the various cycles.

Treatment groups

150 Participants
are divided into 8 treatment groups

8

Treatment groups

See each treatment group below.

Group A: TD preschooler, monolingualActive comparator 1 intervention
Group B: TD preschooler, multilingualActive comparator 1 intervention
Group C: DLD preschooler, monolingualExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group D: DLD preschooler, multilingualExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group E: TD school-age, monolingualActive comparator 1 intervention
Group F: TD school-age, multilingualActive comparator 1 intervention
Group G: SRD school-age, monolingualExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group H: SRD school-age, multilingualExperimental treatment 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

accuracy during task performance

total number and % correct answers, number and % errors during task performance

Time frame
one or two days (one or two consecutive sessions depending on participant's age, collaboration and fatigue)
2

efficiency during task performance

number of repeated cycles, number of cycles needed to reach target performance

Time frame
Intervention occurs during assessment: assessment will last one or two days (one or two consecutive sessions depending on participant's age, collaboration and fatigue)

Secondary outcomes

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.