About this trial
This study aims to develop accessible methods for the early detection of selected neuropathologies in drivers, focusing on multiple sclerosis and Parkinson's disease. The primary objective is to identify clinical tests that correlate with outcomes from the Vienna Test System (VTS), thereby enabling early diagnosis without the need for complex neurological or neuropsychological assessments. Findings could improve the effectiveness of routine driver medical check-ups and inform future modifications to Czech traffic law to enhance road safety.
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
Person after signing informed consent.
After meeting the valid diagnostic criteria for the given neurological diagnosis.
Possession of a valid driver's license and proof of active driving.
Age limit 18 - 85 years.
Disqualifiers
Proven diagnosis of dementia based on a current psychological examination (MMSE 24 points or less).
Diagnosis of a disease or condition that, according to Czech Law. No. 277/2004 Coll., on medical fitness to drive motor vehicles, as amended (especially Law No. 204/2025 Coll.), prevents or significantly limits the ability to drive a motor vehicle safely (e.g. dementia, epilepsy, severe disorders of consciousness).
Age less than 18 years.
Age more than 85 years.
Trial population
Patients from the dispensary care of the neurological department of the University hospital Olomouc with the full access to the paraclinical data and demographic features.
Trial design
Cohort
Prospective
Treatments tested in this trial
Not listed
Trial groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Vienna Test Systems (VTS) - Determination Test (DT)
Vienna Test System (VTS) - Determination Test (DT). A computerized test of attention, stress tolerance, and psychomotor reactivity under complex conditions. Participants are presented with rapidly changing visual and auditory stimuli (e.g., colored lights, acoustic signals) and must respond as quickly as possible using multiple response keys or pedals. Scoring: outcomes include mean and median reaction time (ms), number of correct responses, omission errors (missed stimuli), commission errors (incorrect responses), and measures of performance stability across the task. Faster, more accurate, and stable performance indicates better attentional control and stress tolerance. Administration: conducted in a quiet environment with standardized VTS hardware and software. Trained staff provide uniform instructions and monitor performance.
Vienna Test Systems (VTS) - Reaction Test (RT)
Vienna Test System (VTS) - Reaction Test (RT). A computerized assessment of simple and choice reaction time measuring perceptual speed and motor response. Participants are presented with visual and/or auditory stimuli and instructed to respond as quickly as possible by pressing a button (simple RT) or selecting the correct response among multiple options (choice RT). Scoring: main outcomes include mean reaction time (ms), number of correct responses, and error rates. Faster and more accurate responses indicate better psychomotor speed and attention. Separate scores are calculated for simple and choice conditions. Administration: conducted individually in a quiet, distraction-free environment using standardized VTS hardware and software. Trained staff provide standardized instructions and supervise.
Vienna Test Systems (VTS) - Response inhibition (INHIB)
Vienna Test System (VTS) - Response Inhibition (INHIB). A computerized go/no-go paradigm measuring impulse control and inhibitory executive function. Participants are presented with a continuous sequence of visual stimuli on screen. They are instructed to respond via button press to "go" stimuli and withhold responses to "no-go" stimuli. Scoring: main outcomes include reaction time to go-stimuli, number of correct responses (hits), commission errors (responses to no-go stimuli), and omission errors (missed go-stimuli). Higher accuracy with fewer commission errors reflects better inhibitory control. Administration: conducted individually in a distraction-free environment using standardized VTS software and response panel. Trained staff provide instructions and supervise performance.
Vienna Test Systems (VTS) - Vigilance/Sustained attention (WAFV) - Short version
Vienna Test System (VTS) - Vigilance/Sustained Attention (WAFV). A computerized test measuring sustained attention and vigilance. Participants monitor a continuous sequence of simple visual stimuli (e.g., small changes in geometric figures) presented at regular intervals. They are instructed to respond via button press whenever a predefined critical stimulus appears. Scoring: main outcomes include number of correct detections (hits), omissions (missed targets), false alarms (incorrect responses), and reaction times. Higher hits and faster, stable reaction times indicate better vigilance; higher omissions or false alarms indicate poorer sustained attention. Administration: conducted individually in a distraction-free environment using the standardized VTS software and response panel. Trained staff provide instructions and supervise.
Secondary outcomes
Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)
Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). A clinician-administered screening tool for mild cognitive impairment covering multiple domains: attention, concentration, executive functions, memory, language, visuoconstructional skills, conceptual thinking, calculations, and orientation. The test consists of 30 items with a maximum total score of 30; higher scores = better cognition. A score of 26 or above is considered normal. If the participant has ≤12 years of formal education, +1 point is added. Administration: conducted face-to-face in a quiet environment by trained staff using validated language versions; completion requires \~10-15 minutes. Outcomes: total score and change from baseline.
25-Foot Walk Test (25-FWT)
25-Foot Walk Test (25-FWT). A quantitative measure of ambulatory function and walking speed. Participants are instructed to walk 25 feet (7.62 m) as quickly and safely as possible. Two trials are performed, typically with a short rest interval, and the average time (in seconds) is recorded using a stopwatch. Lower times = better mobility. Use of customary assistive devices (e.g., cane, walker) is permitted and documented. Administration: conducted in a straight, unobstructed corridor with clearly marked start and finish lines. Trained staff provide standardized instructions and supervise for safety. Completion typically requires \~5 minutes. Outcomes: average time to walk 25 feet (7.62 meters), ability to complete the test, and change from baseline.
Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT)
Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT). A brief neurocognitive test of attention, processing speed, and visual scanning. Participants are shown a key pairing nine symbols with digits 1-9. Using this key, they write or orally state the digit corresponding to each symbol in a randomized sequence presented on the test form. Scoring: the number of correct substitutions completed in 90 seconds is counted. Higher scores = better cognitive performance. Errors are recorded but not included in the raw score. Written and oral versions are available; the same mode is used across visits for consistency. Administration: conducted in a quiet environment with standardized instructions, requiring \~5 minutes. Staff monitor to ensure task adherence. Outcomes: total correct substitutions and standard deviation change from the normal value.
Nine-Hole Peg Test (9-HPT)
Nine-Hole Peg Test (9-HPT). A standardized test of finger dexterity and fine motor function. Participants are instructed to place nine pegs into nine holes on a board, one at a time, as quickly as possible, and then remove them. Each hand is tested separately, typically with the dominant hand first, followed by the non-dominant hand. Scoring: performance time (in seconds) for each hand is recorded with a stopwatch. Lower times = better dexterity. Two consecutive trials per hand are averaged. If a peg is dropped, the participant retrieves it and continues. Administration: administered in a quiet environment by trained staff using standardized instructions. Completion time is usually 3-5 minutes for both hands. Outcomes: mean completion time for each hand and change from baseline.
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
University Hospital Olomouc
Lead sponsor
Palacky University
Collaborator