Early EIT-Guided PEEP Titration on Pulmonary Physiology in Patients With Moderate-to-Severe ARDS Undergoing Prone Positioning (EIT-PEEP-PRONE)

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18-80
SponsorXIE MIN

About this trial

Background: Electrical impedance tomography (EIT)-guided PEEP titration has been shown to improve regional ventilation distribution, increase respiratory system compliance, and reduce mechanical power in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), but its effect on mortality remains unproven. In patients with moderate-to-severe ARDS, prone positioning for 4 hours allows pulmonary ventilation and perfusion to reach a new steady state, with optimization of ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) matching and other pulmonary physiological parameters. However, whether dynamic PEEP titration guided by EIT at this time point can further optimize V/Q matching and other pulmonary physiological parameters compared with conventional methods has not been reported.

Objective: To investigate whether EIT-guided PEEP titration performed at 4 hours after prone positioning initiation can further optimize V/Q matching and other pulmonary physiological parameters in patients with moderate-to-severe ARDS undergoing prone positioning.

Methods: This is a prospective, single-center, randomized, open-label, parallel-controlled physiological study. A total of 40 patients with moderate-to-severe ARDS (Berlin definition, PaO₂/FiO₂ \< 150 mmHg) will be enrolled and randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either the EIT-guided group or the control group. PEEP intervention will be performed at 4 hours after prone positioning initiation (T1) in both groups: the EIT group receives EIT-guided PEEP titration, while the control group receives PEEP set according to the ARDSNet/PEEP-FiO₂ table. The primary outcome is V/Q matching percentage assessed by EIT at 18 hours of prone positioning (T2) and 6 hours after supine repositioning (T3). Secondary outcomes include respiratory mechanics, EIT-derived parameters (regional ventilation distribution, global inhomogeneity index, center of ventilation), oxygenation indices, echocardiographic measures of cardiac function, and clinical outcomes (28-day mortality, ventilator-free days, ICU length of stay, etc.).

Conclusion: This study will provide physiological evidence for early EIT-guided PEEP titration in patients with moderate-to-severe ARDS undergoing prone positioning, and will lay the foundation for future large-scale clinical trials.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Diagnosis of moderate-to-severe ARDS according to the Berlin definition, with a PaO₂/FiO₂ ratio < 150 mmHg on optimal mechanical ventilation.

Clinical decision has been made to place a central venous catheter (internal jugular or subclavian vein) for clinical management.

Disqualifiers

Pregnancy or postpartum state.

BMI > 35 kg/m².

Duration of invasive mechanical ventilation > 48 hours at enrollment.

Severe hemodynamic instability (mean arterial pressure < 65 mmHg on norepinephrine ≥ 0.5 μg/kg/min).

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • EIT-Guided PEEP Titration Group

    Other intervention

    PEEP titration is performed during mechanical ventilation to optimize respiratory mechanics and ventilation-perfusion matching in patients with ARDS.

  • ARDSNet/PEEP-FiO₂ Table

    Other intervention

    PEEP will be set according to the ARDSNet/PEEP-FiO₂ table at 4 hours after prone positioning initiation (T1).

Treatment groups

40 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: EIT-Guided PEEP Titration GroupExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: ARDSNet/PEEP-FiO₂ Table GroupActive comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Ventilation-Perfusion (V/Q) Matching Percentage

V/Q matching percentage assessed by electrical impedance tomography (EIT) using the EIT Evaluation Tool (SDMI) V2.7.1. V/Q matching reflects the efficiency of pulmonary gas exchange and is calculated from regional ventilation and perfusion distribution maps.

Time frame
At 18 hours of prone positioning (T2) and at 6 hours after supine repositioning (T3)

Secondary outcomes

1

Respiratory System Compliance

Respiratory system compliance (Crs) calculated as tidal volume divided by driving pressure (plateau pressure minus PEEP), measured under volume-controlled ventilation.

Time frame
Baseline, T2 (18h prone), and T3 (6h post-supine)
2

Driving Pressure

Driving pressure (DP) calculated as plateau pressure (Pplat) minus PEEP, measured under volume-controlled ventilation.

Time frame
At baseline (T0), at 18 hours of prone positioning (T2), and at 6 hours after supine repositioning (T3)
3

EIT-Derived Regional Ventilation Distribution

Regional ventilation distribution assessed by EIT, expressed as percentage of tidal impedance variation in four regions of interest (ROIs): ventral (ROI 1), mid-ventral (ROI 2), mid-dorsal (ROI 3), and dorsal (ROI 4), each corresponding to 25% of the anteroposterior diameter, Center of Ventilation (CoV), Global Inhomogeneity Index (GI), Shunt, Dead Space.

Time frame
At baseline (T0), at 18 hours of prone positioning (T2), and at 6 hours after supine repositioning (T3)
4

RVEDA/LVEDA

Right Ventricular End-Diastolic Area to Left Ventricular End-Diastolic Area Ratio

Time frame
At baseline (T0) and at 6 hours after supine repositioning (T3)

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

XIE MIN

Lead sponsor

Tongji Hospital

Sponsor institution

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: