Early-goal Directed Automated Red Blood Cell Exchange for Acute Chest Syndrome in Sickle Cell Disease

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorAssistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

About this trial

Sickle cell disease (SCD) is characterized by recurrent vaso-occlusive pain crisis (VOC), which may evolve to acute chest syndrome (ACS), the most common cause of death among adult patients with SCD. Currently, there is no etiologic treatment to abort ACS. Therefore, management of ACS mostly involve a symptomatic approach including in routine, and as per recommendations, hydration, analgesics, supplemental oxygen, and transfusion.

The polymerisation of sickle haemoglobin (HbS) is one major feature in the pathogenesis of vaso-occlusion. Current guidelines recommend red blood cell exchange transfusion (REX) in patients with severe ACS in order to improve oxygenation and reduce HbS concentration to blunt sickling. REX is often preferred over simple transfusion in this setting because it rapidly reduces HbS without raising final haematocrit. There are currently two methods for REX: manual (with sequential phlebotomies and transfusions) or automated (erythrocytapheresis). The former allows a sober use of red blood cell packs, while the latter achieves haematological targets (HbS and haematocrit) quickly and more consistently, but requires a special equipment and trained staff. As a result of inflammation and intravascular hemolysis, the plasma of patients with ACS may also contain several components that promote vaso-occlusion, lung injury and organ failure, including cytokines (e.g., IL-6), free haemoglobin and free haem. Conversely, it is depleted in haptoglobin and hemopexin, which normally bind to and clear cell-free haemoglobin. The addition of therapeutic plasma exchange to erythrocytapheresis during automated REX may therefore have a dual beneficial effect in patients with overt intravascular hemolysis: i) deplete the inflammatory mediators and products of hemolysis; ii) replete haptoglobin and hemopexin. REX modalities (automated vs manual) have not been tested during ACS.

The hypothesis is that early-goal directed automated REX may accelerate the resolution of severe ACS as compared to manual REX.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Age ≥ 18 years

Patient with major sickle cell disease syndrome (SS, SC, Sβ0 or Sβ+)

ACS, as defined by the association of fever and/or acute respiratory symptoms with a new pulmonary infiltrate on chest imaging

Requiring supplemental oxygen ≥ 2 L/min for SpO2 ≥ 95%

Disqualifiers

Patient having both ACS criteria and need for supplemental oxygen ≥ 2 L/min for SpO2 ≥ 95% since more than 72 hours

Red blood cell transfusion or REX during the current ACS episode

Any past medical history of delayed haemolytic transfusion reaction

History of < 12 transfused RBC or anti-red blood cell antibody production on the one hand and no possibility for matching on Rh/K, antibody specificity, and extended to Duffy (Fya), Kidd (Jka and Jkb) and MNS (M, N, S and s) phenotypes on the other hand (12)

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Red blood cell EXchange (REX)

    Procedure/Surgery

    A single automated REX will be performed, as soon as possible after randomization.

Treatment groups

130 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Automated REXExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Manual REXActive comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

efficacy of automated (vs manual) REX to reduce time to successful weaning from both supplemental oxygen and any respiratory support (non-invasive or invasive) in adult SCD patients with hypoxemic ACS.

Time to successful weaning from both supplemental oxygen and any respiratory support, defined as SpO2 ≥ 95% without oxygen and any respiratory support (non-invasive or invasive) during 48 hours.

Time frame
48 hours after randomization

Secondary outcomes

1

Number of participants with complications during hospitalisation and within 3 months following randomisation

Time frame
Up to 3 months
2

Time to discharge

Length of hospital stay

Time frame
Up to 3 months
3

Mortality

During hospitalisation and within 28 days and 3 months following randomisation

Time frame
Up to 3 months
4

Number of participants need for noninvasive respiratory support

high flow nasal oxygen, continuous positive airway pressure, or bilevel non-invasive ventilation)

Time frame
Up to 28 days

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: