Patients with multiple myeloma experience a wide range of physical and psychological symptoms from the time of their diagnosis. Meanwhile, patients with aggressive lymphomas undergo unpredictable illness courses, resulting in goals of care conversations occurring late in the illness trajectory and aggressive care being received in the last 30 days of life. Early palliative care alongside usual cancer care has been shown to improve patient outcomes such as symptom burden, mood, and quality of life in patients with solid tumours (e.g. lung, breast or gynecological cancers), but has not been explored among patients with blood cancers to date.
The goal of this clinical trial is to a brief early palliative care intervention for patients with multiple myeloma and aggressive B cell lymphoma and their caregivers (lymphoma only) attending the Princess Margaret Cancer Centre. The main goals of the study are:
* To see if it is possible to apply the early palliative care intervention for patients with multiple myeloma and aggressive lymphoma and their caregivers (lymphoma only) * To see if this early palliative care intervention works well for these patients and caregivers * To compare patient and caregiver experiences with early palliative care and usual care * To explore perceptions and experiences of providing palliative care among healthcare providers involved in the care of these patients and caregivers.
Patients, and their respective caregivers if participating, will be randomly assigned to one of two groups: one group will receive early palliative care in addition to usual care from their blood cancer doctor, and the other group will receive usual care from their blood cancer doctor only. All participants will be asked to fill out questionnaires about their quality of life, symptom burden, mood, and satisfaction with care throughout the study. Researchers will compare the results between the two groups to see if there are any improvements in quality of life for the patients who received early palliative care and their caregivers.
Some patients and caregivers will be asked to take part in interviews at the end of the trial to answer questions about their experience taking part in the study. Some healthcare providers who care for these patients will also be asked to take part in interviews at the end of the trial to describe their perceptions and experiences of providing palliative care.
The researchers will use the results of this study to guide in the development of a larger clinical trial.
None
None
Parallel
Early Palliative Care
Other interventionsee previous description
Feasibility of early palliative care for outpatients with multiple myeloma and aggressive lymphoma and their caregivers (lymphoma only)
The intervention will be feasible if the following criteria are met: (i) accrual of at least 80 patients (40 with multiple myeloma and 40 with aggressive B cell lymphoma) and up to 40 caregivers of patients with aggressive B cell lymphoma over 12 months; (ii) ≥60% of recruited patients and caregivers complete self-reported outcomes (PROs) at baseline, and monthly for three months; and (iii) ≥60% of patients and their caregivers in the intervention arm have at least one visit to the palliative care clinic.
Patient quality of life as measured by the FACIT-Pal
The FACIT-Pal (Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Palliative Care) quality of life scale is a version of the 27-item FACT-G (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General) scale, with the addition of 19 items for patients with advanced illness. These 46 items measure physical, social/family, emotional, functional well-being, and additional concerns. Total scores range from 0-184, with higher scores indicating better quality of life.
Patient quality of life as measured by the FACIT-Pal
The FACIT-Pal (Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Palliative Care) quality of life scale is a version of the 27-item FACT-G (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General) scale, with the addition of 19 items for patients with advanced illness. These 46 items measure physical, social/family, emotional, functional well-being, and additional concerns. Total scores range from 0-184, with higher scores indicating better quality of life.
Patient symptom control as measured by the ESAS-r-CS
The ESAS-r-CS (Edmonton Symptom Assessment System-revised plus constipation and trouble sleeping) consists of 11 scales with anchors of 0 (best) and 10 (worst) with symptom descriptions for pain, fatigue, drowsiness, nausea, anxiety, depression, appetite, dyspnea, well-being. Individual symptom scores are summed for the ESAS Distress Score (9-items) and Total Distress Score (11-items). Individual scores range from 0-10, with lower scores indicating better symptom control.
Patient and caregiver depression as measured by the PHQ-9
The PHQ-9 (Patient Health Questionnaire-9 item version) is a measure for screening, diagnosing, and monitoring the severity of depression. Total scores range from 0-27, with higher scores indicating worse depression.
Patient satisfaction with care as measured by the FAMCARE-P16
The FAMCARE-P16 (FAMCARE satisfaction with care scale-16-item patient version) is a 16-item scale that measures patient satisfaction with information-giving, availability of care, psychological care and physical patient care in patients with advanced cancer. Total scores range from 16-80, with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction with care.
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
University Health Network, Toronto
Lead sponsor
Myeloma Canada
Collaborator
The Leukemia and Lymphoma Society of Canada
Collaborator
