Health TrialsbyHealthPanel

Comparison of the Efficacy of Conventional Versus Minimally Invasive Non-Surgical Periodontal Therapy in Periodontitis Patients

ConditionsPeriodontal DiseaseStage III Periodontitis
Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseEarly Phase 1
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age20-40
SponsorMansoura University

About this trial

the aim of this study is to investigate the clinical outcomes of Minimally Invasive Non-Surgical Therapy(MINST) compared to Conventional non-surgical periodontal therapy (CNST)

Eligibility criteria

This trial accepts healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

• Patients with stage III pericdontitis, according to the American Academy of Periodontology (AAP) and the European Federation of Periodontology (EFP) periodontal classification system .

Medically free patients.

Non-smokers

Patients with good oral hygiene.

Disqualifiers

Pregnant or lactating females.

Patients with systemic diseases that might affect periodontal health

previous periodontal treatment within 6 months before baseline examination.

prior antibiotic regimen use within 1 month before baseline examination

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Mechanical debridement .

    Device

    On the conventional non-surgical periodontal therapy side, a power-driven piezo•electric ultrasonic scaling device with scaling tips will be used the majority of the time to debride subgingival biofilm and calculus. and manual standard gracey curette instruments will be used to refine residuals from root surfaces.

  • minimally invasive mechanical debridement

    Device

    Briefly. the root surface of teeth will be thoroughly debrided by a minimally invasive approach using specific thin and delicate piezo-electric scaling tips (Woodpecker � Tip P3. Am Perfect sp. z o .• � Poland) and manual miniature periodontal curettes {� Dent Solutions. Cairo. Egypt) for reducing periodontal tissue trauma. Adjunctive use of magnification loupes will be performed.

Treatment groups

30 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: conventional non-surgical periodontal therapyExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Minimally Invasive Non-Surgical TherapyExperimental treatment 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Plaque index (PI)

1\. Plaque index (PI):The index assigns a score to each tooth based on the amount of plaque present. 0: No plaque is visible. 1. A thin film of plaque is present at the gingival margin (gumline) and can be detected with a probe. 2. Visible plaque along the gingival margin. 3. Heavy plaque accumulation in the gingival margin and interdental spaces.

Time frame
basline, 1 month , 3 months
2

Bleeding on probing (BOP):

): "0" if no bleeding occurred within 10 second, and "1" if there was bleeding within 10 second.

Time frame
baseline, 1 month , 3 months
3

Probing pocket Depth (PPD)

): will be measured from the gingival margin to the base of the periodontal pocket.

Time frame
baseline , 1 month , 3 month
4

Clinical Attachment Level (CAL)

will be measured from the cement-enamel junction to the base of the periodontal pocket.

Time frame
baseline ,1 month , 3 month

Secondary outcomes

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Mansoura University

Lead sponsor

Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Apply now