About this trial
The main aim of the present study is to investigate whether orally (lingual spray) administered oxytocin influences human top-down attention via oxytocin receptors and whether its effects are dose- and task-dependent.
Eligibility criteria
This trial accepts healthy volunteersQualifiers
Healthy male subjects without past or current psychiatric or neurological disorders
Disqualifiers
History of or current neurological/psychiatric disorders;
Use of psychotropic medications (including nicotine)
Visual impairments
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
Oxytocin lower does (24IU)
DrugOxytocin (24IU) will be administered as a lingual spray (6, 0.1puffs (4IU per puff) of spray on and under the tongue)
Oxytocin higher does (48IU)
DrugOxytocin (48IU) will be administered as a lingual spray (6, 0.1ml sprays (8IU per puff) on and under the tongue)
Atosiban
Drug150ug atosiban administered by lingual sprays (6, 0.1ml sprays on and under the tongue)
Placebo
DrugPlacebo administered as a lingual spray (6, 0.1puffs (4IU per puff) of spray on and under the tongue). Placebo has the same composition of 0.9% saline and glycerol as for oxytocin and the atosiban interventions.
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Error rates in prosaccade and antisaccade trials
Error rates in prosaccade and antisaccade using eye- tracking technique
Responses latencies for prosaccades and antisaccades
response latencies for correct first saccades will be measured on each prosaccade or antisaccade trial using eye-tracking
Secondary outcomes
Oxytocin concentration
OT concentrations will be measured in blood (plasma) samples (6ml) taken from indwelling catheter in median cubital vein and saliva samples (1-2ml) taken using passive drool. OT concentrations will be measured using appropriate essays.
Pupil size
Pupil size will be measured during antisaccade task using eye-tracker
State anxiety
State anxiety will be measured using a questionnaire (40 self-report question-state-trait-anxiety inventory, with total scores ranging from 20-80, where higher scores indicate greater anxiety).
Correlation between prosaccade latency and antisaccade errors
The correlation between two of the primary outcome measures (prosaccade latencies and antisaccade errors) taken during trials will be analyzed using the Spearman correlation test for each treatment group. Differences between correlations in the groups will be assessed using Fisher's z tests
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.