About this trial
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether radiotherapy (i.e. treatment with ionizing radiation to destroy cancer cells) can prevent symptoms in patients with metastatic cancer, having high-risk bone metastases that currently result in no or only mild symptoms. High-risk bone metastases are bone metastases at high-risk of developing bone complications, such as fractures or myelum compression.
The main questions this study aims to answer are:
* Can preventive radiation of high-risk asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic bone metastases (and observation or medication) decrease the number of skeletal related events (i.e. bone complications due to bone metastases) in patients with metastatic cancer? * Can preventive radiation of high-risk asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic bone metastases (and observation or medication) decrease the need for hospitalization related to such bone metastases, improve overall survival and (health-related) quality of life? * What are the side effects of preventive radiation of high-risk asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic bone metastases?
Researchers will compare 2 treatment groups in order to answer the questions listed above: 1 group treated with medication or observation alone (group A) and 1 group treated with medication or observation and preventive radiotherapy (group B).
Participants will
* be screened to assess whether they are eligible to participate in the study. * be randomized (i.e. drawn) into the 2 treatment groups mentioned above. * be treated with preventive radiotherapy if they were drawn in treatment group B. * need to attend follow-up visits (may be via teleconsultation) at 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months after date of randomization during which safety and efficacy is monitored. During these follow-up visits, the general health condition of the participant is evaluated, the occurrence of any bone complication, the medications taken by the participant are registered, the degree of pain and location of the high-risk bone metastases are determined and possible side effects are registered. Furthermore, the participant needs to complete 2 questionnaires at each visit regarding his/her quality of life.
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
I1: Histologically confirmed solid tumor malignancy (with polymetastastic spread (≥ 3 metastases))
I3: Number of Risk Factors (NRF) prognostic score 0-2
I4: Age ≥ 18 years
I5: Ability to provide informed consent (either by the patient or by a legally authorized representative)
Disqualifiers
E1: Previous RT to the target treatment site(s)
E2: NRF prognostic score 3
E3: Serious medical co-morbidities that preclude radiotherapy
E4: Bone lesion complicated with a pathological fracture or impending pathologic fracture for which prophylactic stabilization is recommended, characterized by Mirels score of ≥9 [Mirels et al].
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
Preventive radiotherapy
RadiationEither conventional radiotherapy (single dose of 8 Gy) or Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiation (either 1x20 Gy, 2x12 Gy, 3x10 Gy or 5x8 Gy) will be delivered depending on the participant's prognostic outcome.
Systemic therapy (Standard of Care)/Observation
DrugIt concerns systemic therapy if applicable according to the standard of care or only observation.
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Time to a symptomatic skeletal related event (SSE) in any bone metastasis or death due to any cause whichever occurs first
Time to an SSE in any bone metastasis or death due to any cause whichever occurs first. An exception are SSE in bone metastases that were already treated with surgery or radiotherapy before study participation.
Secondary outcomes
Need for hospitalization related to the high-risk bone metastasis(es).
The number of hospitalizations related to the high-risk bone metastases will be compared between arm A (systemic therapy/observation) and arm B (systemic therapy/observation + upfront radiotherapy).
Overall survival (OS)
Overall survival
Quality of life (QoL) measurement by EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL questionnaire (physical and emotional function, dyspnoea, pain, sleeping difficulties, appetite, nausea/vomiting, constipation, fatigue)
Changes in the scores regarding physical and emotional function, dyspnoea, pain, sleeping difficulties, appetite, nausea/vomiting, constipation and fatigue over time compared to baseline as well as absolute scores will be compared between both treatment arms. The scale ranges from 1 up to 4 with a higher score representing a worse outcome.
Quality of life (QoL) measurement by EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL questionnaire (overall quality of life)
Changes in the scores, representing the participant's overall quality of life, over time compared to baseline as well as absolute scores will be compared between both treatment arms. The scale ranges from 1 up to 7 with a higher score representing a better outcome.
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
Cancer Research Antwerp
Lead sponsor
Kom Op Tegen Kanker
Collaborator