Effect of a Bundle of Interventions on the Outcomes of Patients With Intracranial Devices (ICP Monitor e EVD)

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorBeneficência Portuguesa de São Paulo

About this trial

Non-randomized clinical trial conducted in the adult ICUs of Brazilian hospitals participating in the IMPACTO MR Platform, involving adult patients using an intracranial pressure monitoring catheter device or external ventricular drain.

The study will test the hypothesis that the intervention bundle, following ANVISA recommendations for care practices, will reduce the rates of central nervous system infections associated with ICP and EVD devices.

This reduction is expected to lead to more accurate diagnoses, decreased antibiotic usage, shortened ICU and hospital stays, and reduced hospital costs.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Adult patients with intracranial pressure monitoring catheters (intraventricular or intraparenchymal) and/or external ventricular drain.

The patient can be included from the moment the catheter is implanted, without there being a minimum time for inclusion.

Disqualifiers

Suspected or confirmed brain death.

Trial design

Design model

Sequential

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Health care practices and routines

    Behavioral

    The scope of the project includes a diagnostic visit to participating hospitals, conducted by the coordinating center team, to understand existing protocols related to the management of invasive central nervous system devices (such as intracranial pressure monitoring catheters or external ventricular drains), as well as the physical infrastructure, human resources, and other precautions taken for the prevention and treatment of central nervous system infections. All recommendations in the intervention bundle for patient care will align with the guidelines of the National Health Surveillance Agency (ANVISA) and the best available scientific evidence for preventing infections associated with central nervous system devices. * Provide the best care for patients with ICP and/or EVD, based on the best available evidence, with regard to the insertion and maintenance of catheters, as well as diagnosis and treatment in the presence of infection. * Training of the multidisciplinary team.

Treatment groups

1,300 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: BaselineNo intervention 0 interventions
Group B: InterventionExperimental treatment 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

To evaluate the effect of the intervention bundle in ICUs on reducing central nervous system infections related to devices.

To compare the incidence of device-related central nervous system infections at baseline and after the implementation of the intervention bundle. The percentage of suspected infection cases and those confirmed by ANVISA criteria will be compared at both study timepoints.

Time frame
30 days after study inclusion

Secondary outcomes

1

Microbiological profile identified in CSF culture results.

Microbiological characteristics of device-related central nervous system infections, considering the prevalence of microorganisms (multi-resistant or not) at baseline versus the group included after the intervention bundle. The outcome will be measured based on the positive liquor culture and antibiogram.

Time frame
30 days after study inclusion
2

Risk factors

To compare microbiological characteristics of device-related central nervous system infections, considering the prevalence of microorganisms (multi-resistant or not).

Time frame
30 days after study inclusion
3

Drug treatment during hospital stay

To compare treatment practices for device-related central nervous system infections at baseline versus the group included after the intervention bundle. The outcome will be measured based on the antibiotic classes used to treat CNS infection, dose and time of use of antibiotics. The treatment data will be collected from the medical prescription during the hospital stay.

Time frame
30 days after study inclusion
4

Diagnostic accuracy

The difference between the percentages of suspected and confirmed infection cases at baseline will be evaluated, compared to the group included after the intervention bundle.

Time frame
30 days after study inclusion

Other outcomes

Locations

This trial has no locations.

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Beneficência Portuguesa de São Paulo

Lead sponsor

Ministry of Health, Brazil

Collaborator

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: