Effect of Bone Augmentation Simultaneous to Implant Removal on the Prognosis of Reimplantation at the Same Site

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18-90
SponsorThe Dental Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine

About this trial

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of bone augmentation simultaneous to implant removal on the prognosis of reimplantation at the same sites, providing recommendations for management strategies after failed implant removal.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

1. Age greater than 18 years 2. Implant failure requiring removal 3. Plan to reimplant in the same site 4. Periodontal health, or stabilized periodontitis after treatment

Disqualifiers

1. Uncontrolled metabolic diseases 2. Taking medications that have an effect on bone metabolism 3. The implant has detached at the time of consultation 4. Do not consent to reimplant in the same site 5. Unwillingness to participate in the follow-up of this study 6. Other conditions that do not qualify for implant therapy

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • bone augmentation simultaneous to implant removal

    Procedure/Surgery

    Placement of bone substitutes in the socket simultaneous to implant removal, and reimplantation is performed after 6 months of healing.

Treatment groups

40 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Bone augmentation simultaneous to implant removalExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Natural healing after implant removalNo intervention 0 interventions

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Ridge Height (RH)

Two reference lines were established for the radiological analysis: the longitudinal axis of the implant and a line perpendicular to this axis and tangential to a reference point (sinus floor in the maxilla and mandibular base in the mandible).Ridge height (RH) in mm, defined as the distance between the tangential reference line and the most coronal point of the bone crest, assessed buccal (B-RH) and lingual (L-RH).

Time frame
Before implant removal and 6 months after implant removal

Secondary outcomes

1

Ridge Width (RW)

Two reference lines were established for the radiological analysis: the longitudinal axis of the implant and a line perpendicular to this axis and tangential to a reference point (sinus floor in the maxilla and mandibular base in the mandible).Ridge width (RW) in mm, recorded at 1, 3, and 5 mm from the bone crest. In the event of discrepancy between the buccal and lingual bone crests, the most apical one was chosen as reference.

Time frame
Before implant removal and 6 months after implant removal
2

Bone Plate Thickness (BPT)

Two reference lines were established for the radiological analysis: the longitudinal axis of the implant and a line perpendicular to this axis and tangential to a reference point (sinus floor in the maxilla and mandibular base in the mandible).Bone plate thickness (BPT) in mm, assessed at 1, 3, 5, and 7 mm below the crest and measured buccal and lingual.

Time frame
Before implant removal and 6 months after implant removal
3

Bone Mineral Density(BMD)

Bone density in the socket 6 months after implant removal

Time frame
6 months after implant removal
4

Inserting Torque(IT)

Time frame
Replantation surgery

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

The Dental Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine

Lead sponsor

Hospital of Stomatology, Wuhan University

Collaborator

Shanghai Stomotological Hospital

Collaborator