Effect of Collaborative Requesting on DCD Refusal Rates: Randomized Controlled Trial

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorNantes University Hospital

About this trial

The most common reason for not obtaining donation after brain death (DBD) or donation after controlled circulatory death (DCD) in France is refusal of consent by the relatives. Many observational studies suggest that consent rates may increase when the request is made by specially trained and highly experienced professionals. One technique that may maximize the consent rate is collaborative requesting made jointly by the physician in charge of the patient and an organ procurement coordinator (OPC).

Although the general principles are the same for DCD as for DBD, several differences and specificities exist. First, withdrawal of life-sustaining treatments (WLST) decisions should be entirely independent from organ-donation considerations, in order to eliminate potential conflicts of interest. However, separating conversations about WLST and donation may not always be possible. Potential DCD situations often occur after an extended ICU stay with the development of close ties between families and staff. The ICU physician may therefore feel that suggesting donation during the WLST conversation serves the family-ICU staff relationship.

An unblinded multicenter randomized controlled trial tested the null hypothesis of no difference in organ-donation consent rates between collaborative requesting (clinical team and OPC together) vs. the clinical team only (routine requesting). The potential donors met criteria for brain-stem death or had impending brain-stem death; none were candidates for DCD. Collaborative requesting did not increase the consent rate.

The PRODON study will test whether collaborative requesting by the ICU team and OPC decreases the rate of DCD refusal by families compared to routine requesting by the ICU team only.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Patient 18 years or more Patients in the ICU for whom a decision to withdraw life-sustaining treatments (WLST) has been made and for whom the cessation of circulatory and respiratory functions is anticipated to occur within a time frame that will enable organ recovery

Patient's relative 18 years or more Has consented to participate in the trial Has had at least one conversation with the clinical team before study inclusion Has good knowledge of spoken French

Disqualifiers

None

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Collaborative request

    Other intervention

    The relative is approached by the clinical team and an organ procurement coordinator together.

Treatment groups

548 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Collaborative requestExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Routine requestNo intervention 0 interventions

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Rate of DCD refusal by the family

Our primary outcome measure (refusal of organ donation) will be determined very shortly after the organ-donation request.

Time frame
One day

Secondary outcomes

1

The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) completed by the participating relative

The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), which measures symptoms of anxiety and depression, will be completed by the participating relative. 2 scores are calculated: Seven questions relate to anxiety (total A) and seven others to the depressive dimension (total D), allowing thus obtaining two scores (maximum score for each score = 21). Minimum score =0. A high score corresponds to the "worst outcome". Lower (better) HADS scores are expected in the collaborative group at both time points

Time frame
3 and 12 months after the death of the patient
2

The Revised Impact of Event Scale (IES-R) completed by the participating

The Revised Impact of Event Scale (IES-R), which assesses the risk of developing post-traumatic stress syndrome, will be completed by the participating relative. Lower (better) IES-R scores are expected in the collaborative group at both time points.

Time frame
3 and 12 months after the death of the patient
3

The Inventory of Complicated Grief (ICG) completed by the participating relative

The Inventory of Complicated Grief (ICG), which measures symptoms of protracted/complicated grief, will be completed by the participating relative. Lower (better) ICG scores are expected in the collaborative group

Time frame
12 months after the death of the patient
4

A qualitative psychosociological evaluation of the experience of the family

A qualitative psychosociological evaluation of the experience of the family with collaborative vs. ICU-team-only requesting will be performed in 40 relatives during a telephone interview with a psychologist or sociologist

Time frame
3 months after the death of the patient

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Nantes University Hospital

Lead sponsor

University of Burgundy

Collaborator

Famirea Study Group

Collaborator