Effect of Continuous Supraglottic Oxygen Insufflation Via Video Laryngoscope Blade on Apneic Oxygenation During Tracheal Intubation Under General Anesthesia

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18-75
SponsorAffiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University

About this trial

This study is a prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial aimed at investigating the efficacy and safety of a novel oxygenating video laryngoscope blade during apneic oxygenation for intubation under general anesthesia. Hypoxemia is prone to occur during anesthesia induction, which can lead to severe complications. Apneic oxygenation is an important method to prolong the safe apnea time, but existing oxygen delivery modalities have limitations in applicability. Although the laryngeal oxygen delivery approach combined with video laryngoscopy has theoretical advantages, clinical evidence is insufficient. Therefore, this study was conducted.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Patients aged between 18 and 75 years, with ASA physical status I to III, and scheduled for surgery with general anaesthesia and orotracheal intubation

Disqualifiers

cardiac disease (ischaemic heart disease, heart failure [NYHA ≥2 ],current arrhythmias, pulmonary hypertension)

severe asthma, moderate to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

pregnancy

baseline oxygen saturation <95%

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • control group (Group C)

    Procedure/Surgery

    Before surgery, all participants received a radial arterial line. At arrival to the operating theatre, ECG, invasive arterial blood pressure, pulse oximetry, and train-of-four monitoring were applied. An i.v. line was secured, and a standard infusion of electrolyte solution was started. Participants were then placed supine, in a 10 degrees reverse Trendelenburg position. Preoxygenation was then perform using atight fitting face mask and having each subject breathe 100% O2 at 15 L/min.Tracheal intubation was thereafter performed using a video laryngoscope when the anaesthetist assessed the conditions as appropriate in the control group (Group C).The correct placement of the tracheal tube was confirmed visually by the anaesthetist in charge and a member of the study team. The tracheal tube was secured, and the participant was left apnoeic with the tracheal tube open to the atmosphere until the peripheral oxygen saturation declined to 93% or apnoea is sustained for 5 minutes.

  • The continuous laryngeal oxygen supply group (Group B)

    Device

    The continuous laryngeal oxygen supply group (Group B) used the same preoxygenation and anesthesia induction methods as the control group. When intubation conditions were assessed to be met, laryngoscopy was performed to evaluate the airway. If the laryngoscopic view was Cormack and Lehane grade 3 or grade 4, the subject was excluded from the study and tracheal intubation was performed. Otherwise, continuous laryngeal oxygen supply was initiated through a modified disposable video laryngoscope blade, which has an internal lumen. The distal end of the blade is connected to an oxygen delivery tube, and the other end of the oxygen delivery tube is connected to a flowmeter, with an oxygen flow rate of 10 L/min to maintain a continuous oxygen supply to the larynx. Upon reaching an SpO2 of 93% or apnoea is sustained for 5 minutes, tracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation was commenced, and the protocol was terminated.

Treatment groups

150 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: control group (Group C)Active comparator 1 intervention
Group B: The continuous laryngeal oxygen supply group (Group B)Experimental treatment 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2) at 3 min

arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2) at 3 min when intubation criteria are met

Time frame
3 minutes after intubation

Secondary outcomes

1

PaO2 at before preoxygenation

Time frame
Baseline (before preoxygenation)
2

PaO2 at 1 minutes when intubation criteria are met

Time frame
1 minute after intubation
3

PaO2 at 2 minute when intubation criteria are met

Time frame
2 minute after intubation
4

PaO2 at 5 minutes when intubation criteria are met

Time frame
5 minute after intubation

Other outcomes

Locations

This trial has no locations.

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University

Lead sponsor

The Second Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University

Sponsor institution

The Second Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University

Collaborator

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: