Effect of Different Sitz Bath Methods on Perianal Abscess After Surgery

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18-75
SponsorThe Affiliated Hospital of Putian University

About this trial

Perianal abscess is a purulent infection of the tissues surrounding the anal canal and rectum. The postoperative wound is prone to infection, and the literature indicates that hip bathing is helpful to prevent infection, reduce edema, and promote healing. Therefore, patients need to use a bidet for medical sitz bath to avoid infection and contamination. The bidet on the market is divided into ordinary type and rinse type (manual or electric). There are no high-quality studies comparing the effects of these sitz baths.

A prospective randomized controlled trial was designed to investigate the effects of regular sitz bath, manual irrigation, and electric irrigation. A total of 102 patients with perianal abscess in the Affiliated Hospital of Putian University were included in the study. The patients were 18-75 years old and underwent surgical treatment. Patients with recurrent abscess, anal fistula, mental disease, pregnant or lactating women, and diabetes were excluded. The patients were divided into general group, manual group and electric group by random number table method, with 34 cases in each group. All patients received hip bathing with 0.02% potassium permanganate solution at 41-43 ° C three times a day for 10-15 minutes each time after surgery.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Patients aged between 18 and 75 years

Patients were diagnosed with perianal abscess

Underwent perianal abscess treatment

Underwent sitz bath after surgery

Disqualifiers

Patients with recurrent perianal abscesses or those with concurrent formation of anal fistulas;

Patients with Crohn's disease;

Patients with mental disorders;

Pregnant or lactating women;

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Ordinary sitz bath, manual flushing sitz bath, electric flushing sitz bath

    Behavioral

    Ordinary sitz bath, manual flushing sitz bath, electric flushing sitz bath

Treatment groups

102 Participants
are divided into 3 treatment groups
Group A: conventional groupNo intervention 0 interventions
Group B: Manual groupExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group C: electric groupExperimental treatment 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Wound healing time

The effectiveness of different sitbath methods in promoting recovery after perianal abscess was demonstrated by the healing time of the patient's surgical wound.

Time frame
Daily from Day 1 until complete epithelialization (max 60 days post-op)

Secondary outcomes

1

Complication incidence

Measurements include the incidence of postoperative bleeding, urinary retention, etc.

Time frame
Time Frame: Within 30 days postoperatively
2

pain and swelling

visual analog scale

Time frame
Day 1, 3, 5, 7, and Day 14±2

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: