Effect of Dry Needling Plus Vibration on Myofascial Trigger Points in Individuals With Nonspecific Low Back Pain

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age35-65
SponsorUniversidad de Zaragoza

About this trial

This study evaluates whether adding mechanical vibration to dry needling (DN+V) is not inferior to dry needling alone (DN) for reducing low back pain intensity in adults with nonspecific low back pain (NSLBP), when both interventions are combined with a structured exercise program.

The primary hypothesis is non-inferiority in pain reduction (Numeric Pain Rating Scale, NPRS) at 1 week after treatment, using a non-inferiority margin of 1 point on the 0-10 NPRS scale. If non-inferiority is confirmed, secondary analyses will explore whether DN+V is superior to DN alone in patient-reported treatment acceptability, pain experienced during the intervention, and post-needling soreness.

Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two parallel groups: DN plus exercise, or DN+V plus exercise. Outcomes will be assessed at baseline and at multiple time points up to 4 weeks after treatment, including pain intensity, disability, acceptability, muscle strength, pressure pain threshold, quality of life, and global impression of change. Direct and indirect costs associated with both interventions will also be collected to provide data for a future economic evaluation of the cost-effectiveness of DN+V compared with DN.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Individuals with NSLBP: pain persisting for more than six weeks, located between the twelfth rib and the buttocks, and scoring at least 3 points on the Numeric Pain Rating Scale;

Presence of MTrPs in any of the following muscles that are associated with low back pain (erector spinae muscles, longissimus, iliocostalis, multifidus, gluteus maximus, gluteus medius, and quadratus lumborum);

Aged between 35-65 years: this population exhibits the highest prevalence of low back pain and consequently represents the greatest socio-economic impact on society;

Having signed the informed consent form.

Disqualifiers

Diagnosis of specific pathologies associated with low back pain (e.g., herniated discs, neurological disorders);

Any form of infiltration within the past 3 months;

Having received any physiotherapy interventions in the lumbopelvic region within the past 4 weeks;

History of surgical intervention in the lumbopelvic region;

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Dry Needling with Vibration + Exercise

    Other intervention

    Participants will receive one session of dry needling combined with vibratory stimulation, plus a structured exercise programme (3 sessions/week for 4 weeks). A sterile acupuncture needle will be inserted into the affected muscle(s) and, once correctly positioned, will remain stationary throughout the intervention. Vibratory stimulation will then be applied to the needle for 60 seconds at the maximum intensity tolerated by the participant, up to a maximum output of 5 V. In relation to the exercise program, participants will complete a protocol based on core stabilization and lumbar strengthening.

  • Conventional Dry Needling + Exercise

    Other intervention

    Participants will receive one session of conventional dry needling, plus the same structured exercise programme as the experimental group (3 sessions/week for 4 weeks). A sterile acupuncture needle will be inserted into the affected muscle(s), and the intervention will consist of the "fast in-and-out" technique described by Hong (1994), performed at an approximate frequency of one insertion per second (1 Hz) without completely withdrawing the needle from the skin. The technique will be applied for up to 60 seconds with the aim of eliciting local twitch responses. However, the procedure may be discontinued at the participant's request if it becomes intolerably painful. In such cases, the actual duration of the intervention will be recorded. In relation to the exercise program, participants will complete a protocol based on core stabilization and lumbar strengthening.

Treatment groups

108 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Dry needling with vibration + ExerciseExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Conventional dry needling + ExerciseActive comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Nonspecific Low Back Pain (Numeric Pain Rating Scale)

This variable refers to the participants' low back pain at the time of the assessment. It does not include the pain caused by the treatment itself. The Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) will be used. This scale ranges from 0 to 10, where "0" indicates no pain and "10" represents the worst possible pain intensity. Patients will select the number that best reflects the intensity of their pain. The NPRS is a widely used, simple scale that offers good sensitivity and provides suitable data for statistical analysis.

Time frame
This variable will be measured immediately before the intervention, immediately after the intervention, at 24 hours, 48 hours, 72 hours, 1 week, and 4 weeks.

Secondary outcomes

1

Acceptability

Patient-reported acceptability of the assigned treatment, measured with a purpose-developed Acceptability Scale. This scale is scored as a percentage, with 100% indicating the highest level of acceptability and 0% indicating the lowest.

Time frame
72 hours post-treatment
2

Pain During the Intervention

Pain intensity experienced during the needling procedure, measured with the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS). This scale ranges from 0 to 10, where "0" indicates no pain and "10" represents the worst possible pain intensity.

Time frame
Immediately post-treatment
3

Post-Needling Soreness

It is a highly prevalent adverse effect of dry needling. This pain does not refer to that caused by the MTrPs, but rather to that caused by the needling itself. This variable will be measured with the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS). This scale ranges from 0 to 10, where "0" indicates no pain and "10" represents the worst possible pain intensity.

Time frame
Immediately, 24, 48, and 72 hours post-treatment

Other outcomes

1

Functional Disability (Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire)

Functional disability will be assessed using the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ), a tool designed to measure physical disability caused by low back pain. The questionnaire consists of 24 items, with scores ranging from 0 (no limitations) to 24 (maximum possible disability), evaluating limitations in various daily life activities.

Time frame
Evaluation times will be immediately before the intervention and 72 hours, 1 week, and 4 weeks after intervention.
2

Quality of Life (Short Form-36 Questionnaire)

The Short Form-36 Questionnaire will be used to assess this variable. This survey comprises 36 questions about general health. The questionnaire consists of eight subscales (physical functioning, physical role, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, emotional role, and mental health), summarized into two scores: physical and psychological health. Scores range from 0 to 100% and reflect self-perceived health-related quality of life.

Time frame
This variable will be measured immediately before the intervention, and 1 and 4 weeks after intervention.
3

Pressure Pain Threshold (PPT) (algometry)

PPT will be assessed using a digital algometer (Somedic SenseLab, Suecia) with a 1 cm² rubber tip. The pressure will be applied perpendicularly to the skin at a constant rate of 0.5 kg/s until the participant reports that the pressure sensation changes to pain. To differentiate between peripheral and central mechanisms, measurements will be taken at two locations: 1) Locally, directly over the treated MTrP in the lumbar region (peripheral sensitization), and 2) Distally, at a remote site such as the tibialis anterior muscle (central sensitization). Before the actual tests, the PPT will be familiarized by applying it to the participant's dominant arm until the participant becomes familiar with the test procedure. Three measurements will be taken at each site, but not at precisely the same point to avoid influencing the pain threshold from previous measurements, with a 30-second rest interval, and the mean value will be used for statistical analysis.

Time frame
This variable will be measured immediately before the intervention, immediately after the intervention, at 72 hours and at 1 and 4 weeks.
4

Surface Electromyography (EMG)

It will be recorded using mDurance equipment. For each measurement, the amplitude of the electromyographic activity (measured in microvolts -mV-) of the target musculature at rest will first be recorded for 10 seconds. Then, the muscle activation level during maximal isometric contraction will be recorded to normalize the electromyographic signal. This will follow the same methodology as the maximal isometric strength variable (three maximal isometric contractions of 5 seconds each, with 30 seconds of rest). In this case, the parameter of interest will be the signal's peak amplitude. Lastly, 10 dynamic repetitions of the functional movement "front squat" will be evaluated. This data will determine the percentage of muscle activation relative to maximal isometric contractions, known as the "percentage of maximal voluntary isometric contraction" (%MVIC).

Time frame
This variable will be measured immediately before the intervention, immediately after the intervention, at 72 hours, and at 1 and 4 weeks.

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Universidad de Zaragoza

Lead sponsor

Carlos III Health Institute

Collaborator

Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Aragón

Collaborator

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: