About this trial
This prospective, multicenter observational study aims to evaluate the effect of different flow rates of high-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) on the quality of the laryngoscopic view during videolaryngoscopy in adult patients undergoing general anesthesia. Each patient will serve as their own control, with repeated measurements obtained at three different HFNO flow settings (0, 40, and 60 L/min). The study will assess objective and subjective parameters of glottic visualization using standardized scoring systems.
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
Age ≥18 years
Scheduled for endotracheal intubation under general anesthesia
Use of videolaryngoscopy
Disqualifiers
Anticipated difficult airway
Emergency intubation
Contraindications to HFNO
Inability to obtain adequate video recording
Trial population
Adult patients undergoing elective surgical procedures requiring endotracheal intubation under general anesthesia.
Trial design
Case-control
Prospective
Treatments tested in this trial
HFNO flow 0
DeviceDifferent flows will be applied to patients undergoing general anaesthesia during airway management. In this arm flow will be 0 l/min. During these flows images will be captured using videolaryngoscope.
HFNO flow 40
DeviceDifferent flows will be applied to patients undergoing general anaesthesia during airway management. In this arm flow will 40 l/min. During these flows images will be captured using videolaryngoscope.
HFNO 60
DeviceDifferent flows will be applied to patients undergoing general anaesthesia during airway management. In this arm flow will 60 l/min. During these flows images will be captured using videolaryngoscope.
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Quality of view
Percentage of glottic opening (POGO score) assessed from recorded videolaryngoscopic images.
Secondary outcomes
Cormack-Lehane classification
Ordinal grading of glottic view using Cormack- Lehane classification.
Subjective image quality (Likert scale)
Subjective assessment of laryngoscopic image quality rated on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = very poor, 5 = excellent) by independent evaluators blinded to HFNO flow conditions
Locations
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: