Effect of Manual and Mechanical Glide Path Preparation on Working Length Accuracy.

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
AgeNot listed
SponsorPakistan Institute of Medical Sciences

About this trial

Accurate working length determination is essential for successful root canal treatment and is influenced by proper glide path preparation. This in vitro study aims to compare the accuracy of working length achievement following manual and mechanical glide path preparation techniques. Sixty extracted single-rooted permanent teeth will be randomly allocated into two groups. Group 1 will undergo manual glide path preparation using stainless steel K-files, while Group 2 will receive mechanical glide path preparation using rotary PathFile instruments. Initial and final working lengths will be measured using an electronic apex locator and confirmed with digital radiographs. The difference between the initial and final working lengths will be analyzed statistically. The results of this study will help identify the more effective glide path preparation technique for maintaining working length accuracy and improving endodontic treatment outcomes.

Eligibility criteria

This trial accepts healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

None

Disqualifiers

None

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Manual Glide Path Preparation

    Procedure/Surgery

    Glide path is created using stainless steel K-files (size #10) with a watch-winding motion and gentle vertical filing to establish a smooth path from the canal orifice to the apex.

  • Mechanical Glide Path Preparation

    Procedure/Surgery

    Glide path is created using rotary PathFile instruments (#13 and #16) with an engine-driven handpiece, following manufacturer instructions to establish a smooth path from the canal orifice to the apex.

Treatment groups

60 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Manual Glide Path PreparationExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Mechanical Glide Path PreparationActive comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Accuracy of working length achievement in mm

The primary outcome of this study will be the accuracy of working length achievement after glide path preparation using manual and mechanical techniques. It will be assessed by measuring the difference between the initial working length (recorded before instrumentation) and the final working length (recorded after glide path preparation and canal shaping) in millimeters. Working length measurements will be obtained using an apex locator and confirmed with digital periapical radiographs. A smaller difference between the initial and final working lengths will indicate better maintenance and achievement of the accurate working length.

Time frame
Six months

Secondary outcomes

Other outcomes

Locations

This trial has no locations.

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: