About this trial
Accurate working length determination is essential for successful root canal treatment and is influenced by proper glide path preparation. This in vitro study aims to compare the accuracy of working length achievement following manual and mechanical glide path preparation techniques. Sixty extracted single-rooted permanent teeth will be randomly allocated into two groups. Group 1 will undergo manual glide path preparation using stainless steel K-files, while Group 2 will receive mechanical glide path preparation using rotary PathFile instruments. Initial and final working lengths will be measured using an electronic apex locator and confirmed with digital radiographs. The difference between the initial and final working lengths will be analyzed statistically. The results of this study will help identify the more effective glide path preparation technique for maintaining working length accuracy and improving endodontic treatment outcomes.
Eligibility criteria
This trial accepts healthy volunteersQualifiers
None
Disqualifiers
None
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
Manual Glide Path Preparation
Procedure/SurgeryGlide path is created using stainless steel K-files (size #10) with a watch-winding motion and gentle vertical filing to establish a smooth path from the canal orifice to the apex.
Mechanical Glide Path Preparation
Procedure/SurgeryGlide path is created using rotary PathFile instruments (#13 and #16) with an engine-driven handpiece, following manufacturer instructions to establish a smooth path from the canal orifice to the apex.
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Accuracy of working length achievement in mm
The primary outcome of this study will be the accuracy of working length achievement after glide path preparation using manual and mechanical techniques. It will be assessed by measuring the difference between the initial working length (recorded before instrumentation) and the final working length (recorded after glide path preparation and canal shaping) in millimeters. Working length measurements will be obtained using an apex locator and confirmed with digital periapical radiographs. A smaller difference between the initial and final working lengths will indicate better maintenance and achievement of the accurate working length.
Locations
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: