Effect of the Hockey Slideboard Training Combined With Blood Flow Restriction (BFR) in the Rehabilitation Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Surgical Reconstruction (ACL-R)

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18-45
SponsorSpitalul Municipal Odorheiu Secuiesc

About this trial

ACL injuries represent a major health and economic burden. The overall incidence of ACL injuries has increased and is likely to continue to increase, in part due to increased sports participation.

In the acute post-surgical phase there is a period of physiologic recovery from the surgical injury and subsequent relative muscle disuse that is associated with atrophy loss of strength and anterior knee pain. Therefore, improvement of muscle function is a priority in the rehabilitation and reathletization process.

To achieve significant muscle hypertrophy as well as a possible subsequent increase in strength, it is widely accepted that resistance exercises with relevant load (\~70% of the one repetition maximum - 1RM) are necessary; however, in patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL-R), exercises with high loads are considered unsafe in the early stages and could increase the risk of re-injury.

BFR training is an established muscle training and rehabilitation technique in which the blood supply to and from the muscles involved in the exercise is restricted using an external device.

Although the physiological mechanisms related to this intervention are not yet well understood, it is thought that in BFR training, despite the low level of mechanical tension, the main driver of myocellular hypertrophy could be metabolic stress that is realized by local accumulation of metabolites. Thus, it seems that hypertrophic adaptations can be induced with much lower exercise intensities using BFR. In fact, when combined with low-load resistance training (e.g., 20% 1RM), training with BFR has shown positive results in increasing muscle volume and strength after ACL-R in complete safety comparable to standard training without BFR.

It has also already been demonstrated how incorporating the use of the hockey slideboard into the rehabilitation procedure following ACL-R gives benefits in terms of strength recovery of the extensor muscles of the operated limb with the same safety profiles as standard rehabilitation.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

having undergone ACL-R following a unilateral rupture, with reconstructive surgical technique by bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft (BPTB) or semitendinosus-gracilis autograft (STG)

ACL-R including associated meniscal lesions treated with selective meniscectomy and/or non-complex meniscal suture

Disqualifiers

not having undergone ACL-R following a unilateral rupture, with reconstructive surgical technique by bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft (BPTB) or semitendinosus-gracilis autograft (STG)

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Hockey slideboard combined with BFR training

    Other intervention

    Hockey slideboard combined with BFR training

  • Hockey slideboard

    Other intervention

    Hockey slideboard

Treatment groups

30 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: ACL-R with hockey slideboard training combined with blood flow restriction (BFR)Experimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: ACL-R with hockey slideboard trainingActive comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Adductor muscles maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC)

Adductor muscles' maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) measured via hand-held dynamometer test in a supine position

Time frame
Before the study intervention (T0) and after the study intervention lasting for four weeks (T1)

Secondary outcomes

1

Abductor muscles maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC)

Abductor muscles' maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) measured via hand-held dynamometer test in a supine position

Time frame
Before the study intervention (T0) and after the study intervention lasting for four weeks (T1)
2

Adductor/abductor isometric strength (MVIC) ratio

Adductor and abductor muscles' maximal voluntary isometric (MVIC) strength ratio measured via hand-held dynamometer test in a supine position

Time frame
Before the study intervention (T0) and after the study intervention lasting for four weeks (T1)
3

Y-balance test (YBT) composite score

The YBT assessment demands that the athlete maintain balance on one leg while extending the opposite leg as far as feasible in three different directions: anterior, posterolateral, and posteromedial. The YBT composite score is calculated by summing the three reach distances and normalizing them to the lower limb length.

Time frame
Before the study intervention (T0) and after the study intervention lasting for four weeks (T1)
4

Triple hop test for distance

Triple hop test executed, calculating the maximum reached distance and comparing the healthy limb result with the involved leg.

Time frame
After the study intervention lasting for four weeks (T1)

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.