Effect of Two Different Mobilization Techniques in the Treatment of Low Back Pain

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age25-40
SponsorEhab Mohamed Kamel Ahmed

About this trial

Non-specific low back pain (NSLBP) is extensively musculoskeletal conditions, where manual therapy techniques have been widely employed in its management, but their short term efficacy in chronic low back pain still need more investigations. Objective: This study aimed to discuss the SNAG versus Maitland techniques in the management of NSLBP. Methods: 60 patients with chronic NSLBP will share in the study. Sessions will be conducted 3 times per week for 4 weeks. The outcomes will be evaluated for pain by the numerical rating pain scale (NPRS), disability through Oswestry Disability Index, flexion range of motion by back range of motion device, postural stability by Biodex system will be assessed at baseline, immediately post-intervention, and at a four-week follow-up

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Adults aged 25 to 40 years.

Diagnosed with chronic NSLBP persisting for more than three months.

Pain intensity between 3 to 6 on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) during lumbar extension in a sitting position.

Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score between 20% to 40%.

Disqualifiers

Specific causes of low back pain (e.g., herniated disc, spinal stenosis).

History of spinal surgery or trauma.

Neurological deficits or systemic diseases affecting the musculoskeletal system.

Pregnancy.

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Maitland

    Procedure/Surgery

    Maitland technique therapy, which consists of passive mobilizations applied to the lumbar facet joints in an anterocranial direction while the patient is in a prone lying position

  • SNAG

    Procedure/Surgery

    The technique involves applying a sustained glide to the lumbar facet joints while the patient is in a sitting position, and the pelvic girdle will be stabilized by a belt. Then the therapist will ask the patient for active forward flexion of the spine while the pressure on the facet joint is maintained during the movement till its end

Treatment groups

60 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: MaitlandActive comparator 2 interventions
Group B: SNAGActive comparator 2 interventions

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Numeric Pain Rating Scale

The NPRS will be used to evaluate the level of pain by selecting a number on a rating scale, ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst and unbearable pain).

Time frame
4 weeks

Secondary outcomes

1

Functional disability

Assessed by the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) where according to the scale the disability will be indicated as follow: 0-4 no disability, 5-14 mild disability, 5-24 moderate disability, 25-34 severe disability, and 35-50 complete disability

Time frame
4 weeks
2

Lumbar flexion range of motion

Measured using a Back range of motion (BROM)

Time frame
4 weeks
3

overall stability index (OSI)

Repositioning error evaluated through proprioceptive testing provided by the Biodex Balance System, no need for cut off) as the measurement differences will be compared.

Time frame
4 weeks

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Ehab Mohamed Kamel Ahmed

Lead sponsor

University of Hail

Sponsor institution

The Scientific Research Deanship, University of Ha'il

Collaborator

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: